For The Washington Post

ONE TIME USE ILLUSTRATION FOR OP-KAGAN ON THE TRUMP DICTATORSHIP

The Washington Post

cartoon-pritchett-yachts

Music-Drake Kendrick Lamar

op-allen-democracypromo

(iStock)

stock

Patient lying inside a medical scanner in hospital

(Michelle Kondrich/The Washington Post)

WAUKESHA, WI - MAY 1st: Former president Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally on Wednesday May 1st, 2024.  (Photo by Sara Stathas for the Washington Post)

RUSSIA-US-DIPLOMACY-BASKET-COURT

Contributor

FILE PHOTO: Protests continue on Columbia University campus in support of Palestinians

Supreme Court of the United States

Photographer

**ONE TIME USE ONLY FOR OP-LAMOTT

Election 2024 Trump

promo handout

Promo image for edit-solar-storm-0424.

Election 2024 Pennsylvania

other

Hundreds gather for the Lost Voices of Fentanyl Rally in Washington, D.C.

staff

Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Carolyn Hax: Is it weird to ask other people to care about you?

Ask Amy: Can’t a single woman eat alone without interruption?

Miss Manners: Miss Manners: Gag gift falls flat

The world’s coolest hotels want to tell you a story

Cruise ships to return to Baltimore two months after bridge collapse 

Some cruise prices are about to get a little more clear

At campus protests, ‘DO NOT TALK TO THE MEDIA’!

Trump’s lawyer charges Michael Cohen lied to jury

CNN gets a presidential debate — and a much-needed win

Russia shows resilience. There is more to do for Ukraine.

Trump promises tax cuts and fewer rules. CEOs shouldn’t fall for it.

Tariffs against China hamstring the transition to a clean energy future

How Jim Jordan tried to connect the dots on Biden’s $8 million book deal

‘Never Trump?’ ‘Never Biden’ voters might loom larger.

Ukraine gamble pays off: Republicans face little backlash in primaries

She finished chemo then got a medical degree: ‘The dream is real now’

Puppy abandoned with heart-rending note is adopted, named Minerva

Man, 91, shocks tiny firehouse with $500K gift: ‘Nobody knew how much I’d saved’

Joey Gallo returns, but Nats endure another quiet offensive night

Bryce Harper, Joey Gallo and a bond forged by baseball since they were kids

A taco will always be a taco — no matter what we call it

Blue Origin to fly again as space tourism struggles to get off the ground

These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is real.

Boeing delays spaceflight again as it continues to struggle with leak

Book Tour: At home with Amor Towles

In photos: The scene in Houston after severe storms killed at least 7 people

Civilians flee new Russian attacks on Ukraine border

Biden’s false claim that inflation was 9 percent when he took office

Did Obamacare ‘massively’ increase the cost of health care?

Mexican taquería’s new Michelin star puts street eats on par with gourmet food

Police believe a U.S. rapist killed several women in Canada

With its energy network nearly destroyed, Ukraine already fears the winter

Trump

Brendan McDermid

Manhattan District Attorney <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/22/alvin-bragg-da-trump-investigation/" target=_blank>Alvin Bragg</a> has been demeaned, dismissed and denounced. How dare he bring a state criminal case against a former president! How dare he “jump the line” to try his case first! From the ill-informed to ill-intended, his critics have refused to recognize that this is a tightly drawn, factually sound case that a Manhattan jury is likely to decide against pouting, surly former president <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/donald-trump/" target="_blank" class="contextual_link">Donald Trump</a>, who exuded contempt for the proceedings in a <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/15/trump-new-york-hush-money-trial-schedule/" target=_blank>devastating hearing on Thursday</a>.

The core issue was Trump’s motion to dismiss the entire case. Point by point, Justice Juan Merchan shot down each Trump argument and, by implication, the critics who scorned the case. <a href="https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/People-v-DonaldTrump2-15-24Decision.pdf" target=_blank>His ruling</a> put to rest the notion that this is a picayune matter. “The Court agrees that the instant matter involved a complex investigation. Further, while it is true that the charges involve the lowest level felony and no one suffered physical harm, it can hardly be said that the allegations are not severe.” He emphasized, “The People claim that the Defendant paid an individual $130,000 to conceal a sexual encounter in an effort to influence the 2016 Presidential election and then falsified 34 business records to cover up the payoff.” In short, the judge wrote; “Those are serious allegations.”

The media routinely calls this the “<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/14/trump-stormy-daniels-case/" target="_blank">hush money</a>” case. But the payment of hush money is neither illegal nor relevant. It is the attempt to illegally conceal damaging information from voters that is at issue. If the “big lie” about a stolen election was the central feature of Trump’s attempted coup after the 2020 election, the lie about the nature of his payments was an effort — just days after the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-recorded-having-extremely-lewd-conversation-about-women-in-2005/2016/10/07/3b9ce776-8cb4-11e6-bf8a-3d26847eeed4_story.html" target="_blank">“Access Hollywood” revelation</a> — to con voters in 2016.

The judge specifically held that Trump (infamous for delaying his cases) did not suffer any deprivation of due process rights because of the district attorney’s office. The case is going to trial on March 25. Period.

Merchan also explained that the elevation to felony counts was fully justified <a href="https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2022/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/" target=_blank>under New York law</a>: The falsification of business records rises to a felony when “his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.” (The allegation of lying to conceal other crimes echoes the obstruction charge in the Mar-a-Lago case; the coverup is at least as bad as the underlying crime.)

Merchan held that “the invoices, checks, and general ledger entries are in fact ‘business records’” under the statute. (“The invoices, checks, and general ledger entries created in 2017, that were kept and maintained by the Trump Organization, reflected payments made to [then-Trump-lawyer Michael] Cohen for a scheme that was discussed and implemented by Cohen and the Defendant in 2015 and 2016.”) Noteworthy: The scheme originated before Trump became president and was unrelated to his job as president.

As for lifting the counts to felonies, Merchan cited prior cases (yes, this is nothing new) to show that all that is required is intent to commit other crimes. Of those on offer here — federal election finance laws, state election finance laws, tax laws (by grossing up amounts to Cohen) and causing other false records (i.e., for the “catch and kill” scheme) — Merchan found all but the last sufficient to present to the jury. That gives Bragg three solid theories, with factual support, to present in support of his felony charges.

Bragg also presented evidence of Trump’s intent to defraud sufficient to defeat any motion to dismiss. “The People submit that Defendant’s ‘intent to defraud’ was established in the Grand Jury by evidence that Defendant sought to suppress disclosure of information that could have negatively impacted his campaign for President of the United States and that he made ‘false entries in the relevant business records to prevent public disclosure of both the scheme and the underlying information.”

Merchan dismissed a favorite Trump complaint: selective prosecution. The sole instance Trump cited — campaign violations by Hillary Clinton, his 2016 opponent — as evidence he was singled out, Merchan said, was not remotely similar. Moreover, the judge pointed to plenty of other cases, 437 to be exact, in which falsification of business records was charged as a felony because the defendant intended to conceal other crimes.

And that is where Bragg critics falter. Rather than go hunting for something to pin on Trump, Bragg made the correct decision not to exempt Trump from charges 437 other New Yorkers faced simply because he is now a former president. This goes to the heart of the rule of law. Former presidents enjoy no get-out-of-jail-free cards either for conduct before or during their presidency. (<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/02/14/trump-immunity-appeal-supreme-court-special-counsel/" target=_blank>The Supreme Court will likely decide</a> whether Trump has immunity for alleged crimes committed during his presidency.) If it were otherwise, we would countenance a special status simply for a small class of former presidents.

Do we really want criminals <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/presidential-candidates-2024/" target="_blank" class="contextual_link">running for president</a> so they might avoid ever being prosecuted? And to the extent critics think this is just a “small crime,” their beef is with the people of New York who decided this conduct constitutes a felony.

That’s the case: easily explained to a jury, resting on sound facts and justifying felony charges that have been brought against other defendants. As Merchan explained at the hearing, Bragg did not choose to jump ahead of other cases. (To the contrary, he deferred to others should they have started in early March.) Trump’s excessive delays and appeals (all losers, to date) pushed back other cases. The judge therefore slotted the case for late March. The people of New York have every right and expectation that their laws be enforced.

Bragg must still prove all the elements of the crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. Though Cohen is a shaky witness, to put it mildly, evidence appears to support the key contentions. Manhattan jurors sworn to follow the facts and apply them to the law will be the ultimate deciders. Those who think it’s wrong to prosecute Trump will be weeded out during jury selection. And then Trump will face a jury of his peers. No wonder he is so angry at the prospect of going to trial.

University of California at Berkeley, BA in history

University of California at Berkeley, JD

Jennifer Rubin writes reported opinion for The Washington Post. She is the author of “Resistance: How Women Saved Democracy from Donald Trump” and is host of the podcast Jen Rubin's "Green Room."

Jennifer Rubin

washpost

Bragg gets his chance at Trump in New York

the-washington-post

POOL

Trump Hush Money

Editorials

Columns

Guest opinions

Cartoons

Submit a guest opinion

Today's Opinions newsletter

Opinions

Sign up for the Prompt 2024 newsletter for opinions on the biggest questions in politics

Washington Post Opinions

The Washington Post Opinions section features opinion articles, op-eds, editorials by the Editorial Board, global opinions and letters to the editor on the issues of the day. Offerings include columns by Washington Post opinion writers, political cartoons by editorial cartoonists Ann Telnaes and Michael de Adder and podcasts by Jonathan Capehart.

Sign up for Democracy, Refreshed, a newsletter series on how to renovate the republic.