Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Frances Sharples walked through the glass doors of her credit union, ready to make the worst decision of her life.

She had a script from the man promising to save the retirement account she built over decades as a science adviser to the U.S. government, including in the White House.

He told her to transfer more than $600,000 — and to keep her cellphone on so he could listen to her. If anyone asked whether she was put up to it, she was to reply: “No, absolutely not,” according to her hand-scrawled notes. No one did. She handed the clerk the routing number, walked back to her dented 2005 Honda and returned home.

“Now I’m good,” she told herself. “Now, I’m safe.”

The doctorate-holding daughter of a plumber from Queens had made a life advising the federal government on stem cells, new energy technologies and the effects of biological weapons. Despite a history of meticulousness, Sharples was victimized by a global network of online criminals, including a man with a gentle Indian accent who helped make off with much of her life savings.

How Congress leaned on crime victims to pay for Trump-era tax cuts

The government she served for more than four decades is compounding her pain. The Internal Revenue Service told Sharples, 73, that she had to pay hefty taxes on the stolen money, which the federal government considers income. Tax specialists said someone in Sharples’s position could face a six-figure bill.

The story of how Sharples was hit twice — first by an international criminal network, then by the U.S. tax code — underscores the nation’s vulnerability to global cybercrime and points to inconsistencies in the treatment of fraud victims, law enforcement and tax experts said.

“It goes against a person’s conscience,” said Ismael Guerra, a retired IRS criminal investigator and revenue agent who independently examined Sharples’s case. “The scammers get away, the government gets its piece, and she gets nothing.”

Current and former law enforcement officials say Sharples, like thousands of others each year, was snagged by global scammers who weaponize technological annoyances of modern life, tactics of telemarketing firms and human vulnerabilities to trip up people who aren’t the stereotypical easy mark.

The experts keep telling her she shouldn’t blame herself.

But she’s a scientist. She has evidence before her. And it’s proved impossible to ignore.

Amanda Andrade-Rhoades

In her home office in February last year, with a sparrow’s nest outside her window and chipmunk figurines on bookshelves behind her, Sharples sat stumped by the Spelling Bee word game on her screen.

She was checking another website for hints, hunting for words to help solve the puzzle, when her computer froze. A giant red sign filled her screen, along with a warning and instructions: Her identity had been stolen. She needed to protect herself by calling Microsoft at the 800 number provided.

A man with a vaguely European accent — she wondered, was it Dutch? — picked up her call, identifying himself as Peter Williams of Microsoft. He said her computer and bank account had been compromised and three attempts had been made to withdraw funds. She needed to act now.

It was a classic opening for a well-worn tactic known as a “tech support” scam. FBI figures show an exponential increase in the amount of losses reported in these scams alone, jumping from $15 million in 2017 to more than $800 million last year.

Scammers funnel victims to malicious websites by promoting tainted search results and online ads, experts said.

Williams installed software on her computer, giving him control. He urged her to call the customer service number on the back of her bank card for help.

The man who answered offered his name as Samuel Billings and said he was with the anti-fraud unit of the Department of Commerce Federal Credit Union. In the complaint she would later file with the FBI, Sharples said she hadn’t realized the call had somehow been rerouted.

Sharples said trying to reach the phone number on her card — which she thought was the safe course of action — helped to convince her she was dealing with her credit union. It’s unclear how such a call would be intercepted, although her phone provider later told her a forwarding number she did not recognize had been added to her account.

Commerce Federal chief executive Patrick Collins declined to comment on customer matters or credit union protocols, but said fraudsters are becoming more sophisticated.

Have you been the victim of a scam? Share your story with us through this form.

Billings also raised alarms about the danger to her bank account. He repeated the amounts, down to the penny, of the three attempted withdrawals she had been warned about. Sharples was terrified she could lose it all.

“The whole premise of this was: You need our help to protect your money,” she said.

Billings told her he would help her move it somewhere safe. Working in silent partnership, Billings and his fake Microsoft accomplice got to work on the next stage of their business plan: methodically cleaning out Sharples.

U.S. Senate Photo

As a New Yorker, Sharples didn’t have much need for a car.

That changed in her 20s, when she started commuting on dirt roads to a field station in California’s High Sierra mountains to trap and map the habitats of four species of chipmunks for her ecology dissertation. She bought a beat-up 1967 Chevy station wagon with a rusted-out hole on the driver’s side floor for $375.

Sharples drove 2,500 miles from the University of California at Davis to East Tennessee in 1978 to launch a career as an environmental scientist at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, established as part of the Manhattan Project. In the mid-1980s, she spent one year as a science fellow on Capitol Hill for Tennessee’s Albert Gore Jr., an experience that opened a curtain to Washington.

When Gore held a hearing on genetic engineering — at a time when scientists were sharply divided on the emerging capabilities — Sharples sat beside the congressman, passing notes and prompting him to probe further. “It was so cool,” she said.

One failed marital engagement in Tennessee and 11 years later, she engineered a permanent return to Washington, where she served as a senior analyst at the Office of Science and Technology Policy during the Clinton White House. She worked on tightening ozone and other air quality standards covering smoke and soot as industry interests butted against health advocates.

Sharples spent nearly 20 years as director of the Board on Life Sciences at the National Academy of Sciences, the private society of scholars established by Congress that provides scientific advice to the government. During the Bush administration, she helped to oversee ethical guidelines on stem cell research. After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, her focus at the academy moved to biosecurity.

Despite the stress, the White House was “the most fun I have ever had in a job,” she said.

Samuel Billings, masquerading as a savior from her credit union, said he needed to create a protected investment account for her. He opened it in her name at cryptocurrency exchange Binance.US, the U.S.-based affiliate of crypto giant Binance.

“Happy trading!” read the confirmation message.

Billings started small, saying Sharples first needed to protect the $25,000 in her savings account at Commerce Federal. Williams would keep her on the line from 7 a.m. until bedtime — claiming to be removing malicious software from her computer but mostly lingering silently — for more than two weeks.

Finally, a document appeared on her screen with a list of account names and numbers. Print it out, Billings told her. Drive to your credit union.

According to the script he gave her, if asked, she should say she was moving the money to her investment account, something she does frequently.

Why knowing how to spot a scam doesn’t always protect you

She handed over the sheet directing the $25,000 to be transferred to the Binance.US account on Feb. 25, 2022. Documents from Binance.US and her credit union show the money was moved via a Las Vegas-based financial firm known as Prime Trust LLC, which provided technology services to Binance.US, and Signature Bank.

(Earlier this year, Nevada regulators moved to shutter Prime Trust, citing “unsafe” financials, and it filed for bankruptcy. Signature Bank failed because of poor management, according to federal regulators, and its assets were taken over by another bank. Current and former executives from the companies did not respond to requests for comment.)

Billings guided Sharples around the new account on her screen, showing her the money had arrived. He gave her a password to put her at ease: Blacklist@123.

At 9:26 a.m. on March 1, Binance.US’s automated system emailed Sharples three times, saying she had purchased bitcoin, twice for $10,000 and once for $5,000. The digital money was parked in her new account.

Two minutes later, Binance.US emailed Sharples again to confirm she had asked to transfer the newly purchased bitcoin back out of her account.

“This link will expire after 30 minutes for security reasons,” it read.

What Sharples didn’t know was that Billings and his associates, who could reach into her computer remotely, prevented her from seeing most emails from Binance.US. Within 26 minutes, the account that was supposed to be her safe haven was empty and the scammers were preparing their next move.

Criminals behind the global explosion in cyberscams are psychologically sophisticated, experts say. They’re patient. And their victims are seemingly everywhere, left wrestling with financial ruin and humiliation.

A divorced and lonely home builder from Sharples’s Maryland suburb had $178,000 in retirement savings stolen last year. A seemingly random text message led to a prolonged bout of text flirting, and eventually a trading scam using an intricately designed website that showed soaring, but phony, returns.

Starting in 2020, a 79-year-old woman who played Words With Friends Classic on restless nights after aiding her husband through another day of dementia was being scammed out of $390,000. They also got her engagement ring. The criminals found her through the app, offering companionship and a sense of purpose into this year by conjuring an elaborate tale of an American trapped overseas.

“The manipulation is cruel,” said Montgomery County, Md., police Detective Michael Adami, who investigates such scams.

Scammers have built up a criminal ecosystem and follow market-tested formulas.

Brian Smale

An India-based researcher, Siddhesh Chandrayan, unearthed a return-on-investment spreadsheet used by tech support scammers to sharpen their game. The criminals have help desks, software to manage call volumes and specialists who generate leads, according to Amy Hogan-Burney, a former FBI attorney who is Microsoft’s general manager for cybersecurity policy and protection.

“There should be no shame in being the victim of this, because this is organized crime,” Hogan-Burney said.

U.S. law enforcement, from local police to federal agencies, is struggling to match the soaring growth in cyberscams and cybercrimes involving cryptocurrency, which allows funds to rocket overseas. The FBI estimates more than $10 billion was lost last year through cybercrimes involving romance, investment, government impersonation, tech support and other scams, up from $6.9 billion in 2021.

With Sharples’s regular savings account wiped out, the criminals eyed a bigger prize: her retirement account.

She had been setting aside money for decades, including in a tax-deferred account. Billings told her to cash it out and transfer the money to her credit union.

At that point, a precaution set up to backstop bad customer decisions kicked in. After Sharples asked TIAA — which managed the retirement account — to transfer her money, a senior fraud investigator with the company called to question her decision.

“Is someone else telling you to do this?” he asked.

“No, it’s my idea,” she said, following the script. “I’ve decided I want to invest in a different way.”

That had big tax consequences. As required, TIAA set aside withholdings to cover federal and state taxes. Then it transferred the remaining $630,000 to her credit union.

With those hurdles cleared, the script and procedure at her credit union would be the same as the first time she transferred money.

Sharples scratched out “$25,000” in the script, wrote in “$630,000” and headed for the Commerce Federal to make a transfer that would change her life. The money, as before, flowed into the Binance.US account in her name.

But it took days before her relief at moving the money to safety gave way to growing unease.

She was concerned that she still didn’t have access to the funds, and Billings, who had seemed to treat her with kindness, was pushing hard for her to withdraw her final asset. Sharples had a separate retirement account with about $1 million, but it had tighter limits on what could be taken out because the funds were contributed by her employer.

Billings insisted she close that account and move the money to her credit union. Sharples balked. She called back the fraud investigator at TIAA and told him what was happening. He said it sounded like she’d been taken. In a statement, TIAA said it seeks to aggressively counter such “despicable attempts by unscrupulous scammers.”

Sharples called the man supposedly from Microsoft, telling him she had lost confidence in Billings and didn’t want to take out her money. She was transferred to a supervisor and got an expletive-filled rant.

“It was like telling me, ‘Well, you’re a fool!’” Sharples said. “‘We’re trying to help you!’”

Within minutes, the phone numbers were dead.

Sharples didn’t know the U.S. government would profit from the crime.

“I figured, ‘Well, there’s got to be some way that someone who’s been victimized, as I have, gets a pass, right?’” Sharples said.

The U.S. tax code has long drawn a clear line: When someone takes money from a tax-deferred account, the IRS considers it a distribution. And distributions generally get taxed, regardless of what happens with the money.

That meant Sharples, who had a comfortable income in semi-retirement, suddenly looked like a millionaire to the IRS.

As she prepared her taxes online, Sharples was sickened by what she saw on her Form 1040, which showed the fraud raising her taxes by hundreds of thousands of dollars. She was then drawn through an excruciating education in the nation’s sprawling tax code.

Before 2018, Sharples would have found a long-established deduction for individual theft victims. But congressional Republicans changed the provision in 2017 as part of the biggest overhaul of the tax code in decades. To offset some of the tax cuts and other changes, GOP lawmakers suspended the provision through 2025. This year, more than 100 House Republicans co-sponsored legislation that would make the change permanent.

The House’s tax-writing committee said in 2017 that the repeal of a deduction that helped theft victims was part of an effort to make the tax system “simpler and fairer for all families and individuals.”

Told of the potential consequences of the law change for Sharples and others, an aide to a senior GOP member of the Ways and Means Committee — who agreed to describe the committee’s reasoning on the condition of anonymity — said “tax provisions like this were removed to offset the cost of lowering tax rates for everyone.”

The Biden administration has defended the Trump-era tax law in court, arguing Congress acted deliberately when it suspended tax relief for individual theft victims. The Treasury Department would not comment on Sharples’s case or, more generally, on victims in similar circumstances identified through interviews and court records. A Treasury spokesperson declined to say whether the administration wants the law changed.

The IRS wouldn’t comment on Sharples’s case and said in a statement that it enforces tax laws written by Congress.

Stanford University, BA in political science

Michael Laris writes about the transformation of the U.S. transportation system. He has covered government accountability and was a reporter in Beijing.

Michael Laris

washpost

Former White House scientist was scammed out of $650K and must pay taxes

the-washington-post

Scammer

For The Washington Post

A portrait of a woman with the headline: A former White House scientist was scammed out of $655,000. Then the IRS taxed her.

Amanda Andrade-Rhoades for The Washington Post

The Washington Post

A former White House scientist was scammed out of $655,000. Then the IRS taxed her.

The District

Maryland

Virginia

Crime & Public Safety

Local Education

Obituaries

Transportation

Capital Weather Gang

D.C., Md. & Va.

Fast, informative and written just for locals. Get The 7 DMV newsletter in your inbox every weekday morning.

The Washington Post offers breaking local news, weather and traffic information for the DC, Maryland and Virginia metro areas, plus information about school districts, crime, government, religion, the lottery,restaurant reviews and obituaries.

A former White House scientist was scammed out of $655,000. Then came the IRS.