Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Americans are sleeping more than ever. See how you compare.

Parenting in Gaza today is so much more than keeping your children alive

In photos: Flash floods kill over 100 people in Kenya

Attorney general moves to reclassify marijuana as lower-risk drug

Poll shows how RFK Jr.’s appeal to anti-vaccine right could hurt Trump

Views of the campus protests are too broad — and too narrow

Apple banned this app for years. It’s now America’s No. 1 iPhone app. 

8 major newspapers join legal backlash against OpenAI, Microsoft

Fired Google workers who protested Israel deal file complaint with labor board

Miss Manners: Some audience members ask rambling questions post-lecture

Carolyn Hax: Her family left all the kitchen work to her, so she went on strike

Ask Amy: Why did my friend lie about seeing my ex-girlfriend?

The FBI director’s concerns over terrorism are at ‘a whole other level’ 

U.S. campus protests spread to the Middle East and Europe  

Biden is letting Assad off the hook, with dangerous consequences

Trump and allies say Biden pays rent for ‘illegals’ in Michigan. Not true.

Eighty percent of Ukraine-Israel bill will be spent in U.S. or by U.S. military

Facts in the Trump courtroom v. ‘facts’ in the court of public opinion

A murder plot that cannot be ignored: India must come clean at last

How to confront antisemitism, deal with protests — and respect free speech

Is student loan debt an emergency? Take our quiz.

Southwest passengers now get a $75 voucher for big flight disruptions

The Rick Steves guide to life

The sad, stale state of in-flight vegetarian meals

I learned to heal my sadness by cradling dying chickens 

Brave Little Hunter is free: Baby orca escapes lagoon for open seas

Soldiers reunite with their pets from overseas: ‘It meant everything to me’

Nationals sweep away the Marlins to get back to .500

Jayden Daniels is latest in Washington’s checkered history of first-round QBs

The Rangers swept the Capitals, and it’s time for the new core to take charge

Trump Hush Money

Reporting on Earth’s changing climate and the search for solutions

See more coverage in your recommendations

Climate & environment

The Climate Coach newsletter

Climate alerts

Bloomberg

Want to work fewer days from the office? You could be doing the planet a favor.

Fully remote workers could produce less than half the climate-warming emissions of people who spend their days in offices, according to a <a href="https://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2304099120" target=_blank>new study published Monday</a> in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In an analysis of various work scenarios, people’s behaviors and sources of emissions, researchers found that switching from working onsite to working from home full time may reduce a person’s carbon footprint by more than 50 percent. Hybrid schedules where people work remotely for two to four days a week could also cut emissions by 11 to 29 percent, according to the study.

The findings help shed more light on the factors that can influence the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2022/08/08/4-day-workweek-environment/" target=_blank>environmental and climate effects of different work models</a>, said Longqi Yang, an applied research manager at Microsoft and one of the paper’s authors.

“The remote work has to be significant in order to realize these kind of benefits,” Yang said. “This study provides a very important data point for a dimension that people care a lot about when deciding remote work policy.”

How a four-day workweek could be better for the climate

To conduct the analysis, the study’s authors drew on multiple data sets, including<b> </b>the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s <a href="https://www.bls.gov/cex/cecomparison/recs_profile.htm" target=_blank>Residential Energy Consumption Survey</a> and Microsoft’s employee data on commuting and teleworking behaviors. The researchers,<b> </b>several of whom are Microsoft employees, modeled greenhouse gas emissions of U.S.-based employees working entirely remote, on hybrid schedules and fully onsite. The analysis focused on emissions from a variety of sources, including residential and office energy use, commuting, non-commute-related travel and IT usage.

The study found that working remotely more than one day per week could cut emissions, mainly driven by less office energy use and commuting. But the researchers cautioned against assuming that any amount of remote work could be good for the planet.

“This is a very complicated system,” said Fengqi You, a professor of energy systems engineering at Cornell University and another author of the paper.

For instance, the results suggest that a hybrid model allowing employees to only work one day from home produces a negligible reduction in emissions because the benefits would likely be offset by factors such as more non-work-related travel and home energy use.

“Realizing the environmental benefits of remote work requires careful configurations of lifestyle, home and office, and coordinated sustainable practices and incentives across individuals, companies, and policymakers,” the authors wrote in the study.

Frederic J. Brown

Yang said the research helps characterize what the major sources of emissions related to work are and where they come from. The paper’s findings could give people and organizations a better idea of where to focus efforts if they want to reduce their footprint, he said, adding that emissions associated with commuting and office energy use are clear targets.

The paper also adds to the understanding of the role individual behaviors can play, said Joe O’Connor, director and co-founder of the Work Time Reduction Center of Excellence, who was not involved in the new research.

“This study really emphasizes the importance of lifestyle and the choices that we make ... when we’re working remotely as being really key to realizing the kinds of potential benefits that can be unlocked,” O’Connor said.

John Trougakos, a professor of management at the University of Toronto Scarborough, who has studied remote and hybrid work models, said the research is “another bit of information that we can utilize to help us make more informed decisions.”

“It’s one interesting piece of the puzzle, but not the whole story,” said Trougakos, who was not involved in the study. “To have a comprehensive plan for something like this, you’re looking at more than just the workplace, and obviously the other choices that people make in their life will also impact the emissions that they create and that organizations might create as well.”

The study’s analysis focused on the United States and largely reflects behaviors of office workers who live in a large city. Additionally, You, one of researchers, said the environmental benefits and costs of different work models could shift in the future as the country moves toward greater adoption of electric vehicles and clean energy sources.

“Things will change over time,” You said. “This is a study for now.”

Maximizing the environmental benefits of remote work depends on multiple factors, including vehicle choice, commuting behavior and energy efficiency in homes and offices, the researchers found. For example, the study reported that if hybrid workers shared desks at the office instead of having their own, that could reduce emissions by 28 percent.

The results suggest that fully remote and flexible work options have environmental benefits, Yang said. But he said workplaces should go beyond just addressing their work policies if they want to reduce emissions. He suggested taking steps to power offices with renewable energy or providing cleaner transportation options for commuters, such as electric shuttles.

“We’re not trying to predict the future, but I think the future is all up to us,” Yang said. “This study tells people, if we want to be more carbon neutral in the future, what can we do now?”

Northwestern University, Bachelor of Science in Journalism

Allyson Chiu is a reporter focusing on climate solutions for The Washington Post. She previously covered wellness and worked overnight on The Post's Morning Mix team.

Allyson Chiu

washpost

Working from home could slash emissions by half, study finds

the-washington-post

Washington Suffers As Federal Employees Work From Home

Photographer: Bloomberg/Bloomber

name

prism://prism.query/primary-site,/climate-environment/climate-solutions&limit=20

10 steps you can take to lower your carbon footprint

Climate Solutions

prism://prism.query/site-articles-only,/climate-environment&limit=20

Sign up for the Climate Coach newsletter and get advice for life on our changing planet, in your inbox every Tuesday.