IOWA CAUCUS 2024

Staff Photographer

Trump

The Washington Post

promo handout

HOGP

Trump Classified Documents

Former President Donald Trump Appears In Florida Court For Classified Documents Case Hearing

Staff

Former U.S. President Trump's classified documents case hearing in Fort Pierce

Former President Trump Appears In Fort Pierce Courtroom For Federal Classified Documents Case

Former President Donald Trump Appears In Fort Pierce Courtroom For Federal Classified Documents Case

US former President Trump attends court hearing in Fort Pierce, Florida, Usa - 01 Mar 2024

For The Washington Post

what is it like to be prosecuted by Jack Smith?

2023 Iowa State Fair

A collage with Jack Smith and the text 'Department of Justice'.

jacksteam

Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

On Press Freedom Day, little to celebrate for Hong Kong’s journalists

Young Georgians want to be part of Europe. Their government is in the way.

Taxes are inevitable. Paying to prepare them doesn’t have to be.

Ukrainian men abroad voice anger over pressure to return home to fight 

Blinded in battle, these Ukrainian soldiers will never see their new babies 

Protesting Georgians are begging for real support from the West

Carolyn Hax: Husband keeps pushing modest spouse to wear sexier clothes

Ask Amy: Should I be the best man if I think the bride is abusive?

Miss Manners: Host eats luxurious breakfast, leaves cereal for guest

Wait, what is Stephen A. Smith talking about? Find out with our quiz.

Stephen A. Smith would like even more of your attention

Local sports networks go dark mid-game amid dispute with Comcast 

You asked: Do I need a passport for my cruise?

What’s the best bus to New York? We tested 5 for comfort and value.

Adaptive equipment is making national parks more inclusive

Funding shortfall for new tech endangers rural cell service, FCC says

Russian state media ramping up English, Spanish presence on TikTok, study finds

Microsoft is changing how you log in to your accounts

Cat climbed into Amazon return box, found alive 630 miles away

I learned to heal my sadness by cradling dying chickens 

Brave Little Hunter is free: Baby orca escapes lagoon for open seas

Hope Hicks witnessed nearly every Trump scandal. Now she must testify.

World Press Freedom Day, 2024

Biden holds events in battleground state of North Carolina

Nationals can’t solve Nate Eovaldi, drop series finale to Rangers

How the Nationals helped Mitchell Parker develop into a big leaguer

The 6 best things to do with kids in the D.C. area this weekend 

Riot police and over 2,000 arrests: A look at 2 weeks of campus protests

Look inside a D.C. mansion with an interesting ownership history

See more coverage in your recommendations

Get the weekly Campaign Moment newsletter

Set alerts for major election developments

Election 2024

The Campaign Moment newsletter

Politics alerts

Jabin Botsford

Justice Department and FBI investigators have amassed fresh evidence pointing to possible obstruction by former president Donald Trump in the investigation into top-secret documents found at his Mar-a-Lago home, according to people familiar with the matter.

The additional evidence comes as investigators have used emails and text messages from a former Trump aide to help understand key moments last year, said the people, who like others interviewed for this article spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing criminal investigation.

The new details highlight the degree to which special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into the potential mishandling of hundreds of classified national security papers at Trump’s Florida home and private club has come to focus on the obstruction elements of the case — whether the former president took or directed actions to impede government efforts to collect all the sensitive records.

Adriana Usero

The emphasis on obstruction marks a key distinction so far between the Mar-a-Lago investigation and a separate Justice Department probe into how a much smaller number of classified documents ended up in an insecure office of President Biden’s, as well as his Delaware home. The Trump investigation is much further along than <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/01/21/biden-classified-documents/" target=_blank>the Biden probe</a>, which began in November and is being overseen by a different special counsel, Robert K. Hur. Biden’s lawyers say they have quickly handed over all classified documents found in Biden’s possession.

The Trump investigation team has spent much of its time focusing on events that happened after Trump’s advisers received a subpoena in May demanding the return of all documents with classified markings, the people familiar with the matter said. Smith is trying to determine if Trump or others mishandled national security documents, and if there is enough evidence to ask a grand jury to charge him with obstructing the investigation.

The Mar-a-Lago investigation is one of four separate criminal probes involving Trump, who is campaigning for another term in the White House. Trump <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/30/trump-ny-indictment/" target=_blank>has been indicted by a New York grand jury</a> that heard evidence about money paid to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels during his 2016 presidential campaign. He is set to make <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/31/trump-arraignment-secret-service/" target=_blank>his first court appearance</a> in that case Tuesday. He is also being investigated by the Justice Department and a state prosecutor in Georgia over efforts to block Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election.

An FBI spokesman referred questions to a spokesman for the special counsel, who declined to comment.

Trump spokesman Steven Cheung said in a written statement: “The witch-hunts against President Trump have no basis in facts or law. The deranged special counsel and the DoJ have now resorted to prosecutorial misconduct by illegally leaking information to corrupt the legal process and weaponize the justice system in order to manipulate public opinion and conduct election interference, because they are clearly losing all across the board.”

The statement went on to point to the Biden classified documents probe, as well as the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server when she was secretary of state, suggesting that conduct there was worse than anything that happened at Mar-a-Lago. “President Trump is the only leader fighting for the Constitution and to protect the American people from being abused by those who want to destroy our system of government,” Cheung said.

In the classified documents case, federal investigators have gathered new and significant evidence that after the subpoena was delivered, Trump looked through the contents of some of the boxes of documents in his home, apparently out of a desire to keep certain things in his possession, the people familiar with the investigation said.

Investigators now suspect, based on witness statements, security camera footage, and other documentary evidence, that boxes including classified material were moved from a Mar-a-Lago storage area after the subpoena was served, and that Trump personally examined at least some of those boxes, these people said. While Trump’s team returned some documents with classified markings in response to the subpoena, a <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/08/08/trump-mar-a-lago-search-fbi/" target=_blank>later FBI search</a> found <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/08/12/trump-warrant-release/" target=_blank>more than 100 additional classified items</a> that had not been turned over.

Court papers filed seeking judicial authorization for the FBI to conduct the search of Trump’s home show agents believed that “evidence of obstruction will be found at the premises.”

The application for court approval for that search said agents were pursuing evidence of violations of statutes including 18 U.S.C. 1519, which makes it a crime to alter, destroy, mutilate or conceal a document or tangible object “with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency.”

A key element in most obstruction cases is intent, because to bring such a charge, prosecutors have to be able to show that whatever actions were taken were performed to try to hinder or block an investigation. In the Trump case, prosecutors and federal agents are trying to gather any evidence pointing to the motivation for Trump’s actions.

The Washington Post <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/12/maralago-witness-trump-boxes-moved/" target=_blank>reported in October</a> that Trump’s valet, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/18/walt-nauta-trump-mar-a-lago-documents-witness/" target=_blank>Walt Nauta</a>, had told investigators that he moved boxes at Mar-a-Lago at the former president’s instruction after the subpoena was issued. Smith’s team has video surveillance footage corroborating that account, The Post reported, and considers the evidence significant.

The aide who stayed: Trump valet Walt Nauta, key witness in Mar-a-Lago probe

In addition, the people familiar with the investigation said, authorities have another category of evidence that they consider particularly helpful as they reconstruct events from last spring: emails and texts of Molly Michael, an assistant to the former president who followed him from the White House to Florida before she eventually left that job last year. Michael’s written communications have provided investigators with a detailed understanding of the day-to-day activity at Mar-a-Lago at critical moments, these people said.

Michael’s lawyer did not respond to requests for comment.

Investigators have also amassed evidence indicating that Trump told others to mislead government officials in early 2022, before the subpoena, when the National Archives and Records Administration was working with the Justice Department to try to recover a wide range of papers, many of them not classified, from Trump’s time as president, the people familiar with the investigation said. While such alleged conduct may not constitute a crime, it could serve as evidence of the former president’s intent.

These people said prosecutors have collected evidence that Trump <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/08/23/trump-records-mar-a-lago-fbi/" target=_blank>ignored requests from multiple advisers</a> to return the documents to the archives over a period of a year, that he asked advisers and lawyers to release false statements claiming he had returned all documents, and that he grew angry after being subpoenaed for the documents.

15 boxes: The long strange trip of the records Trump returned to the archives

Investigators also have evidence that Trump sought advice from other lawyers and advisers on how he could keep documents after being told by some on his team that he could not, people familiar with the investigation said. They have collected evidence that multiple advisers warned Trump that trying to keep the documents could be legally perilous.

As investigators piece together what happened in May and June of last year, they have been asking witnesses if Trump showed classified documents, including maps, to political donors, people familiar with those conversations said.

Such alleged conduct could demonstrate Trump’s <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/04/trump-classified-documents-meadows/" target=_blank>habits when it came to classified documents</a>, and what may have motivated him to want to keep the papers. The Post has previously reported that Trump told aides he did not want to return documents and other items from his presidency — which by law are supposed to remain in government custody — <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/11/14/trump-motive-mar-a-lago-documents/" target=_blank>because he believed they belonged to him</a>.

Investigators have also asked witnesses if Trump showed a particular interest in material relating to Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, people familiar with those interviews said. Milley was appointed by Trump but drew scorn and criticism from Trump and his supporters after a series of revelations in books about <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/09/14/peril-woodward-costa-trump-milley-china/" target=_blank>Milley’s efforts to rein in Trump</a> toward the end of his term. In 2021, Trump <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/01/03/mark-milley-january-6-interview/" target=_blank>repeatedly complained publicly about Milley</a>, calling him an “idiot.”

The people did not say whether investigators specified what material related to Milley they were focused on. The Post could not determine what has led prosecutors to press some witnesses on those specific points or how relevant they may be to the overall picture that Smith’s team is trying to build of Trump’s actions and intent.

But people familiar with the matter stressed that a major thrust of the investigation has been the question of obstruction, and whether Trump sought to deliberately prevent officials from gathering all of the classified material at Mar-a-Lago.

The case stretches back to efforts by Archives officials to retrieve documents and other items from the former president in 2021, after they came to believe that some presidential records from the Trump administration — such as <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-kim-north-korea-nuclear/2020/09/30/2b7305c8-032b-11eb-b7ed-141dd88560ea_story.html" target=_blank>letters from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un</a> — were unaccounted for, and perhaps in Trump’s possession.

After months of back-and-forth, Trump agreed in January to <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/12/trump-15-boxes/?itid=lk_inline_manual_40" target=_blank>turn over 15 boxes of material</a>. When archivists examined the material, they <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/10/trump-records-classified/" target=_blank>found 184 documents marked classified</a>, including 25 marked top secret, which were scattered throughout the boxes in no particular order, according to court filings.

That discovery suggested to authorities that Trump had not turned over all the classified documents in his possession when he left the White House. In May, a grand jury subpoena demanded the return of classified documents with a wide variety of markings, including <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/08/11/garland-trump-mar-a-lago/" target=_blank>a category used for secrets about nuclear weapons</a>.

Trump and the Mar-a-Lago documents: A timeline

In response to the subpoena, Trump’s advisers met with government agents and prosecutors at Mar-a-Lago in early June, handing over a sealed envelope containing another 38 classified documents, including 17 marked top secret, according to court papers. According to government filings, Trump’s representatives <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/09/30/trump-lawyers-kise-corcoran-bobb/?itid=lk_inline_manual_43" target=_blank>claimed at the meeting that a diligent search had been conducted</a> for all classified documents at the club.

Agents continued to gather evidence that suggested Trump was not fully complying with either government requests or subpoena demands, and that his team might have misled authorities and possibly held on to some sensitive files.

On Aug. 8, FBI agents conducted <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/12/21/trump-doj-garland-mar-a-lago-january-6/" target=_blank>a surprise court-ordered search of Mar-a-Lago</a> and found 103 documents marked classified, including 18 marked top secret, according to court papers. The investigation has recovered documents that describe <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/21/trump-documents-mar-a-lago-iran-china/" target=_blank>highly sensitive U.S. intelligence efforts aimed at China, one document describing Iran’s missile program</a>, and material covering other sensitive topics, including <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/09/06/trump-nuclear-documents/" target=_blank>nuclear secrets</a>.

Smith’s team has been presenting witnesses and evidence for months to a grand jury in Washington focused on the Mar-a-Lago probe, even as a separate grand jury at the same federal courthouse <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/03/trump-documents-jan6-investigation-lawyers/" target=_blank>hears evidence related to efforts to block</a> the results of the 2020 election, and the state-level prosecutors in <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/30/trump-indictment-suprised/" target=_blank>New York</a> and <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/03/16/georgia-grand-jury-trump-recording/" target=_blank>Georgia </a>press forward with their cases.

The Mar-a-Lago prosecutors recently won a court fight that <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/24/trump-corcoran-grand-jury/" target=_blank>allowed them to question Trump’s lawyer, Evan Corcoran,</a> before the grand jury about what he knew about the documents.

Grand jury proceedings are secret, and Smith has given no public indication of the pace of his investigation or when he expects it to be finished.

Pulitzer Prize co-finalist for Feature Writing, 2017

Pulitzer Prize co-finalist for International Reporting, 2017

Part of team that won Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, 2018

Part of team that won Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, 2022

"October Surprise: How the FBI Tried to Save Itself and Crashed an Election"

McGill University, BA 

Devlin Barrett writes about the FBI and the Justice Department, and is the author of "October Surprise: How the FBI Tried to Save Itself and Crashed an Election." He was part of reporting teams that won Pulitzer Prizes in 2018 and 2022. In 2017 he was a co-finalist for the Pulitzer for Feature Writing and the Pulitzer for International Reporting. 

Devlin Barrett

White House Correspondents Award for Deadline Reporting

University of South Carolina

Josh Dawsey is a political enterprise and investigations reporter for The Washington Post. He joined the paper in 2017 and previously covered the White House. Before that, he covered the White House for Politico, and New York City Hall and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie for the Wall Street Journal.

Josh Dawsey

Washington University in St. Louis, BA

Perry Stein covers the Justice Department and FBI for The Washington Post. She previously covered D.C. education. Before she joined The Post in 2015, she was a staff writer for Washington City Paper and wrote for the Miami Herald. 