Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Elections 2024 live updates: Biden campaign accepts invite to a vice-presidential debate 

David Trone and the history of candidates lighting their money on fire

Trump allies call trial a ‘sham.’ Public opinion isn’t cooperating.

Netflix will air NFL’s Christmas games, a major step for streaming service

Sam Feist, longtime CNN executive, will become CEO of C-SPAN

Michael Cohen testimony ties Donald Trump to hush money payment

Look to the cloud to protect the life documents saved on your computer

Can you spot bad financial advice on TikTok? Take our quiz.

5 myths about Social Security as the program faces a funding crisis

Puppy abandoned with heart-rending note is adopted, named Minerva

Man, 91, shocks tiny firehouse with $500K gift: ‘Nobody knew how much I’d saved’

Retired cop meets abandoned baby he helped 23 years ago: ‘What are the odds?’

Flying budget airlines might not be as cheap as it seems

Some cruise prices are about to get a little more clear

Cruise ships to return to Baltimore two months after bridge collapse 

Best Places to Work in the Federal Government 2023

Suspect in Slovakian prime minister shooting arrested

Frankie the colored bull terrier wins terrier group

Riots are flaring on a French archipelago in the South Pacific. Here’s why. 

Shooting leaves Slovakia’s Fico in serious condition, country on edge 

Who is Robert Fico, Slovakia’s prime minister who was shot?

The Post’s choices in Northern Virginia’s U.S. House primaries

States see legalized sports betting as a tax windfall — but at what cost?

Haiti’s plight is a case study in the ‘responsibility to protect’

The 35 best things to do in D.C. this weekend and next week

Rating every game on the Commanders’ 2024 schedule

The 26 best new restaurants in the D.C. area

Carolyn Hax: Fiancé plans to have a baby with someone else

Ask Sahaj: I live with my parents and generational trauma ‘runs the house’

Miss Manners: Co-worker lies to avoid doing her job

Cruise settles with person dragged under one of its robotaxis

Google’s AI answers could come back to bite it

Senators studied AI for a year. Critics call the result ‘pathetic.’

President Joe Biden Joint Chiefs and Combatant Commanders 

See more coverage in your recommendations

Get the weekly Campaign Moment newsletter

Set alerts for major election developments

Election 2024

The Campaign Moment newsletter

Politics alerts

Jabin Botsford

What we know is this: At some point in or around early 2020, Rudy Giuliani, working as an attorney for President <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/donald-trump/" target="_blank" class="contextual_link">Donald Trump</a>, gave the Justice Department information he’d picked up as he sought to dig up dirt on <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/candidates/joe-biden-2024/" target="_blank" class="contextual_link">Joe Biden</a>, including from a trip he’d made to Ukraine. Attorney General William P. Barr assigned a U.S. attorney in western Pennsylvania to vet the information.

That apparently included interviewing a confidential human source — in this case, an FBI informant — who, it seems, confirmed hearing about an allegation involving a payment made to Biden while he was vice president. There’s necessarily some murkiness about this, given both that the interview with the informant is still closely held by the FBI and given that he or she was conveying secondhand information, among other things.

But someone told Republican members of Congress about all of this. A month ago, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) and Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) <a href="https://oversight.house.gov/release/grassley-comer-demand-fbi-record-alleging-criminal-scheme-involving-then-vp-biden/" target="_blank">sent a letter</a> to the FBI (accompanied by an Oversight subpoena) demanding a copy of the FBI form documenting the informant interview. They did not wait to make public the accusations they apparently already knew it contained, asserting in the letter — that was sent out with a news release — that the interview describes an “alleged criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions.”

Sign up for How To Read This Chart, a weekly data newsletter from Philip Bump

Over the next four weeks, despite having seen the allegation (according to Comer), the Republican majority on Oversight focused not on calling pertinent witnesses or subpoenaing bank records, something they’d done energetically when investigating Biden’s son Hunter. Instead, the focus was on pressuring the FBI to give them a copy of the interview form. The FBI explained that it didn’t share such documents both because doing so would risk exposing its source and because any claims contained in it were unvetted, but Comer, leveraging and amplifying hostility to the FBI stoked by Trump, demanded the FBI meet his demands.

So, on Monday, the FBI <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/06/05/comer-house-gop-biden-giuliani/" target=_blank>showed a redacted version of the document</a> to Comer and Rep. Jamie B. Raskin (Md.), the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee. Comer’s takeaway was the same as it had been before the FBI fulfilled his request: FBI Director Christopher A. Wray needed to be held in contempt of Congress.

That is generally where things stood by midafternoon on Monday. And then Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), now in her fifth month in Congress, decided to escalate things.

It does appear to be the case that the FBI expressed concern that, by making public an unredacted version of the interview, the safety of the confidential human source would be at risk. In a statement, Raskin suggested that the interview focused on “recycling stale and debunked Burisma conspiracy theories” — that is, allegations centered on Hunter Biden’s work in Ukraine. A source that could glean information from people in Ukraine or Russia would understandably be one the FBI would seek to protect.

Notice how Luna frames this, though: The informant would be killed if “unmasked” — “based on the info he has brought forward about the Biden family.” It’s not that someone who was providing information in an ongoing basis to American law enforcement (as this informant was) would be at risk; it is, in Luna’s presentation, that this was occurring because the secondhand information related to the Bidens.

Intentionally or not, this framing tapped into a long-standing thread of rhetoric on the right. Baseless claims that President Bill Clinton had political opponents killed were extended to “the Clintons” once his wife sought the presidency in 2016. Now, the conspiratorial idea that powerful Democrats have opponents killed colored <a href="https://dailycaller.com/2023/06/06/anna-paulina-luna-fbi-informant-biden-allegations/" target="_blank">how Luna’s claim was perceived</a>.

“I think now it’s upwards of 3.3 million impressions just on Twitter alone,” Luna boasted about her tweet to former Trump adviser Stephen K. Bannon on the Tuesday edition of Bannon’s fringe-right podcast. “Obviously that’s huge, because had it not been for social media I don’t know that this truth would be out there like this. I just simply put out a fact that came out of the briefing in Oversight.”

Not really, of course. She took a concern the FBI has been using about its source from the outset and framed it as being not about the source but about Biden.

As it turned out, though, that was perhaps the most defensible claim she made in her conversation with Bannon.

“We know that Comer has been obviously working to get a certain document from the FBI that proves that Biden was receiving money from a foreign national, $5 million, when he was a vice president,” she claimed. “So it’s public corruption.”

Receiving millions of dollars to take an action would be corrupt, certainly. But the FBI document doesn’t “prove” this happened; the indication is only that the FBI informant spoke to someone who seems to have made the same claim that Giuliani first elevated. The informant may even have spoken to the same person as Giuliani did.

In fact, while Comer said on Monday that the interview was part of an ongoing investigation, Raskin said that Barr and the U.S. attorney didn’t find reason to open a full investigation based on the allegation made to the informant.

Comer and Raskin were in the room for the briefing. As she admitted to Bannon, Luna was not.

“We are finding out that not only is the president — this is not a conspiracy, but we have evidence — we are also finding out that the man sitting in the White House is basically guilty of national security violations,” Luna claimed.

Bannon, somewhat surprisingly, asked what evidence she and her colleagues had.

“Because of the information that the FBI has,” Luna replied, “proving that he has received a $5 million payment from a foreign national while he was the vice president.”

She made <a href="https://twitter.com/RepLuna/status/1666270199278862336" target=_blank>the same claim</a> on Fox News on Tuesday night. If the FBI has such evidence, however, it chose not to bring charges in the middle of 2020, a year when Barr’s boss was up for reelection. The more likely assumption is that Luna is simply exaggerating the narrative that Comer has been building for the past month.

This is not hard to imagine. In an interview with right-wing commentator Benny Johnson, Luna <a href="https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1666130822850654220" target=_blank>asserted</a> that the contempt charges against Wray meant that the FBI director “could end up in jail.” In addition to the rationale for holding Wray in contempt being transparently thin, it is wildly unlikely that the Justice Department of Attorney General Merrick Garland would respond to a contempt citation from the House with criminal charges.

Then there’s Luna’s claim that Comer has learned about a leak at the FBI.

“The FBI is infiltrated,” she claimed. “You have a spy by the name of ‘One-Eye’ — I mean, I say it, I feel like I’m in a James Bond movie! But unfortunately, it’s true — who has been leaking information to their knowledge to Hunter Biden.”

This was actually reported back in March. Miranda Devine of the New York Post, a reporter who has reported various allegations about Hunter Biden, <a href="https://nypost.com/2023/03/22/hunter-biden-used-fbi-mole-to-tip-him-off-to-china-probes-tipster/" target=_blank>reported</a> there was an informant named “One-Eye” who was either in the bureau or a veteran of it. This person allegedly took money to give Hunter Biden and his business partners information about probes.

The source of that allegation was Gal Luft, a former member of the Israeli military who faced federal charges of illegal arms dealing that he claimed were a response to his revealing information about the Bidens. Luft was also the informant that Comer last month suddenly <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/15/comer-biden-allegations/" target=_blank>claimed</a> had gone missing — though the chairman at first accidentally suggested that the missing person was the informant who was interviewed by the FBI.

A request to Luna’s office for clarification on her comments was not answered by the time of publication.

This is the pattern for the past month: claims made without evidence, assertions elevated without grounding. Luna simply amplified Comer’s pattern, earning a nice chunk of media attention as a result.

The truth of the matter, however, remains murky — and almost certainly fails to live up to the cinematic presentation of the freshman congresswoman from Florida.

The Aftermath: The Last Days of the Baby Boom and the Future of Power in America

Ohio State University

Philip Bump is a Post columnist based in New York. He writes the newsletter <a href="https://wapo.st/3m3QTiy">How To Read This Chart</a> and is the author of <a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/696653/the-aftermath-by-philip-bump/">The Aftermath: The Last Days of the Baby Boom and the Future of Power in America</a>.

Philip Bump

Anna Paulina Luna gets media attention with dire, baseless claims

the-washington-post

State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress

The Washington Post

Biden administration

The Fix

The 202s

Polling

Democracy in America

Balance of Power Pair

U.S. House Aggregate

U.S. Senate Aggregate

Politics

washpost

prism://prism.query/site-articles-only,/politics&limit=20

Cut through the 2024 election noise. Get The Campaign Moment newsletter.

Post Politics from The Washington Post is the source for political news headlines, in-depth politics coverage and political opinion, plus breaking news on the biden administration and White House, Congress, the Supreme Court, elections and more.