For The Washington Post

An illustration of a smiling face with various plants and flowers framing their head.

wb-brainmatters gardening

Downs Syndrome regression 

A photo illustration of cicadas on an off-white background

The Washington Post

wb-cicadas-autism

Illustration of a woman in a garden of many enormous flowers. The woman has picked a simple small flower from the garden and is smiling.

That’ll do — why ‘good enough’ decisions can be healthier for you

An illustration of a brain with varrying patterns from left to right including a regular brain, jagged shapes, dots, lines, and a more saturated colorful brain. 

wb-brainmatters-menopause

As Mother’s Day approaches...How keeping journals for my kids kept my mother’s spirit alive for me

A man died in front of me. A year later, I’m still recovering.

High School Students

Contributor

An illustration of a person cleaning a table with cleaning supplies. Their head is a misshapen technicolored bubble, with smaller bubbles floating around them.

wb-brainmatters chemicals

Some 11 percent of U.S. children have been diagnosed with ADHD

Tabitha Brown In Conversation 

An illustration of a person happily floating under blue water.

wb-brainmatters float tank

How feeling envy helped me in life — mostly

An illustration of a man reading a book on a park bench, smiling. In the background someone is flying a kite, and another person is playing the guitar.

wb-comic-JOMO

ketaminediary

An illustration of a man sitting on a bed, with his back to the screen raising his arms. A sliver of light comes through the door. 

wb-brainmatters-dreamacts

hescan0319

iStock

other

An illustration of a woman lighting a candle in a dark room. Next to her there is also a lantern and a lamp.

wb-onyourmind not everyone needs therapy

Boys struggle with eating disorders. This best-selling author did too.

An illustration of someone surrounded by vines of roses and thorns. You can see inside their mind which is patterned with just thorns, no roses.

wb on your mind anxiety

Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

How Jim Jordan tried to connect the dots on Biden’s $8 million book deal

‘Never Trump?’ ‘Never Biden’ voters might loom larger.

Ukraine gamble pays off: Republicans face little backlash in primaries

Mexican taquería’s new Michelin star puts street eats on par with gourmet food

Police believe a U.S. rapist killed several women in Canada

With its energy network nearly destroyed, Ukraine already fears the winter

Joey Gallo returns, but Nats endure another quiet offensive night

Bryce Harper, Joey Gallo and a bond forged by baseball since they were kids

A taco will always be a taco — no matter what we call it

She finished chemo then got a medical degree: ‘The dream is real now’

Puppy abandoned with heart-rending note is adopted, named Minerva

Man, 91, shocks tiny firehouse with $500K gift: ‘Nobody knew how much I’d saved’

Biden’s false claim that inflation was 9 percent when he took office

Did Obamacare ‘massively’ increase the cost of health care?

The world’s coolest hotels want to tell you a story

Cruise ships to return to Baltimore two months after bridge collapse 

Some cruise prices are about to get a little more clear

Russia shows resilience. There is more to do for Ukraine.

Trump promises tax cuts and fewer rules. CEOs shouldn’t fall for it.

Tariffs against China hamstring the transition to a clean energy future

Blue Origin to fly again as space tourism struggles to get off the ground

These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is real.

Boeing delays spaceflight again as it continues to struggle with leak

Carolyn Hax: Is it weird to ask other people to care about you?

Ask Amy: Can’t a single woman eat alone without interruption?

Miss Manners: Miss Manners: Gag gift falls flat

Book Tour: At home with Amor Towles

In photos: The scene in Houston after severe storms killed at least 7 people

Civilians flee new Russian attacks on Ukraine border

At campus protests, ‘DO NOT TALK TO THE MEDIA’!

Trump’s lawyer charges Michael Cohen lied to jury

CNN gets a presidential debate — and a much-needed win

Trump

Healthy living, including food, fitness, longevity and mental health

See more coverage in your recommendations

See alerts for Health and Wellness developments

Health & wellness

Tips on living better delivered every Thursday

Well+Being newsletter

Health alerts

Health & Science alerts

A photo illustration of two statues looking at each other with speech bubbles coming out of their mouths. The figure on the left has a speech bubble with a gift emoji, and the figure on the right has a speech bubble with a clock emoji.

If you have ever contemplated ways to improve your romantic relationships, you have probably heard about love languages.

Love language, a theory about how people express and receive love, was introduced 30 years ago by Baptist pastor Gary Chapman. The notion that we all speak a love language has become so entrenched in public consciousness that it has spawned <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/wholesomememes/comments/gndh57/memes_are_my_love_language/" target=_blank>memes</a>, <a href="https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/new-love-languages" target=_blank>satire</a> and even a song by <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MY8K95oaexQ" target=_blank>Ariana Grande</a>.

But some scientists are questioning the validity of the concept. And others have suggested, that in some situations, love language thinking can do harm, encouraging adherents to stay in difficult or even abusive relationships. This month, a <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09637214231217663" target=_blank>paper</a> published in the journal Current Directions in Psychological Science reviewed the scientific literature and concluded that core assumptions about love languages stand upon shaky ground unsupported by empirical evidence.

“I feel like academics haven’t really taken this seriously,” said <a href="https://www.utm.utoronto.ca/psychology/people/emily-impett" target=_blank>Emily Impett</a>, a psychologist and director of the Relationships and Well-Being Laboratory at the University of Toronto who was a co-author of the paper.

Chapman’s book, “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Love-Languages-Secret-that-Lasts/dp/080241270X" target=_blank>The 5 Love Languages: The Secret to Love That Lasts</a>,” has sold over 20 million copies since its original publication in 1992 and been reprinted in 50 languages. The premise is that love means different things to different people, and the key to a happy relationship is understanding your partner’s love language. Their language might be words of affirmation (giving compliments), gifts (presents big and small), acts of service (helping your partner with chores or in other ways), quality time (doing things together) or physical touch (such as hugs, kisses or sex).

Responding to the new scientific review, Chapman said the success of his book speaks for itself. “I think the fact that so many millions of people have read the book, so many people have found it to be helpful in their relationship, that I’m convinced it can have a tremendous positive impact on a marriage,” Chapman said.

There is little academic research into love languages. But when Impett and her co-authors <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Haeyoung-Park-2" target="_blank">Haeyoung Gideon Park</a> and <a href="https://health.yorku.ca/health-profiles/?mid=1456353" target="_blank">Amy Muise</a> dug into the research literature, they found that some of the key assumptions behind “love languages” aren’t supported by relationship science. Here are their findings.

1. People don’t really have a primary love language

Discovering and learning to speak your partner’s primary love language is a key tenet of Chapman’s book. But when researchers ask study participants to rate the love languages on a continuous 5-point scale, they <a href="https://www.psychinquiry.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Vol18-2.pdf#page=50" target=_blank>consistently</a> <a href="https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCOMMJ/TOCOMMJ-7-1.pdf" target=_blank>find</a> that people tend to rate all five love languages very highly indicating that most people connect with most or all five love languages. “In real life, we know that people often don’t need to make these kinds of trade-offs between do you want a partner who is going to touch you versus express love in some other way,” Impett said.

While it may seem like a small point, finding your “primary” love language is a cornerstone of love language advice. “If that’s the core assumption, then everything that follows kind of falls apart in a lot of different ways,” said <a href="https://www.saraalgoe.com/" target=_blank>Sara Algoe</a>, a psychologist who runs the Emotions and Social Interactions in Relationships Laboratory at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and was not an author of the paper.

2. There are more than five love languages

Chapman claims there are five key love languages. But the research indicates that humans express love in more than the five ways defined by Chapman. In the review, Impett and her colleagues raise other possible expressions of love, such as supporting a partner’s <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1088868313498000" target=_blank>personal growth and autonomy</a>.

“We know that these things are really key for relationship satisfaction and might be more meaningful to couples with more egalitarian values,” Impett said. <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-06840-007" target=_blank>Research</a> shows that developing conflict management strategies and integrating partners into one’s larger social network are also distinct behaviors that maintain relationship satisfaction.

Relationship experts say other important behaviors don’t fall neatly into a love language category. “There’s hundreds of them,” said <a href="https://helenfisher.com/" target=_blank>Helen Fisher</a>, biological anthropologist at the Kinsey Institute and author of <a href="https://theanatomyoflove.com/" target=_blank>Anatomy of Love</a>. “Just being nice to your mother-in-law, being on time for the opera, creating interests together, learning things together, doing novel things together. It’s a little different than just spending time together.”

3. Sharing the same love language may not improve your relationship

The practical implication of love languages is that discovering and speaking the same love language as your partner is key to a successful relationship. “The dark side version of this theory that people might take away is that if someone doesn’t quote, ‘speak that language,’ then your relationship is doomed,” Algoe said.

But research shows that partners with matching primary love languages <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-53018-004" target=_blank>did</a> <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-09071-001" target=_blank>not</a> <a href="https://benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOCOMMJ-7-1" target=_blank>report</a> higher relationship satisfaction than those with different love languages. Impett said rigorous statistical analyses suggest that receiving expressions of love in any form is associated with higher relationship satisfaction, regardless of whether the love language matched.

<a href="https://www.gottman.com/about/john-julie-gottman/" target=_blank>John Gottman</a>, one of the pioneers of scientific relationship research, is also skeptical that learning your partner’s love language is a key to relationship happiness. “My general conclusion is that these dimensions are not very distinct conceptually, nor are they very important in terms of accounting for variation in marital happiness and sexual satisfaction,” said Gottman, a psychologist and co-founder with his wife Julie Gottman of the Gottman Institute in Seattle.

<a href="https://5lovelanguages.com/learn" target=_blank>Chapman</a>, who has degrees in anthropology and a doctorate in adult education, said he formulated the five languages and wrote the book after a decade of counseling couples as a pastor in North Carolina and noticing patterns in problem areas that kept cropping up.

“I’m not a researcher,” Chapman said. “But I do think that there are significant numbers of people over the 30 years who have found that concept to be the thing that turned their marriage around emotionally.”

He said 133 million people have taken the <a href="https://5lovelanguages.com/quizzes/love-language" target=_blank>5 love languages quiz</a> online. When he speaks at marriage conferences or goes <a href="https://5lovelanguages.com/events" target=_blank>on tour</a> to churches around the country, a “half a dozen couples come up and say, ‘We just want to tell you, that book saved our marriage.’”

Chapman holds firm in his belief that almost everyone has a primary love language which “tends to stay with us throughout a lifetime,” he said. The only people he’s encountered who say all five are equally important are those who either were always loved or never loved, he said. There are also, “seasons of life and there are circumstances when another love language may jump to the top” for a period of time, he added.

“I mean all five of these are ways that anybody can receive love,” Chapman said. “We’re not going to turn away any one of them I think, but if we don’t have love in our primary language, we will not feel loved, even though our spouses speak in some of the other languages.”

He said some of the research criticizing love languages takes too strict of an interpretation of his work. “I was never dogmatic to say that there’s only five love languages,” Chapman said. But he says after years of people proposing a sixth, “I’m still open, but I’m a little more confident that these (five) are pretty much fundamental to human nature.”

One key concern about love language advice is that it could be interpreted as suggesting the unhappy partner change or compromise their own needs rather than finding common ground. <a href="https://inews.co.uk/opinion/everything-you-know-about-love-languages-is-wrong-2790378" target="_blank">Critics cite</a> one anecdote in Chapman’s book as particularly concerning.

It’s a story about Ann, a woman he counseled, who was unhappy in her marriage. She asked: “Dr. Chapman, is it possible to love someone whom you hate?” Ann said she had “felt used rather than loved” in sexual encounters with her husband.

Although Ann’s husband had never attended counseling, Chapman surmised that her husband’s primary love language was physical touch, and his secondary language was words of affirmation. Chapman advised Ann to focus her attention on those two areas for six months: give verbal affirmations but “stop all verbal complaints.” He also told her to take “more initiative in physical touch.”

In earlier print editions and the current e-book, Chapman encouraged Ann to initiate sex with her husband more often and “surprise him by being aggressive” with a goal of having sex at least once a week at first, and twice a week eventually. The example has been changed in the newest 2015 print edition, and Chapman’s advice to Ann is to surprise her husband “by reaching out with physical gestures” like “ruffling his hair.” His advice on sex now is to “ease into this slowly.”

In the book, Chapman writes that he assuaged Ann’s uncertainty, in part by citing the Bible. He noted that Ann saw a “tremendous change” in her husband’s treatment of her and her husband “swears to his friends that I am a miracle worker.”

Chapman said the example was meant to illustrate that “we can love a person that we don’t like.”

“Because if people begin to feel loved, they tend to respond differently to you,” he said.

Ann’s story has caused some critics to cringe. “I agree that that particular illustration was not good,” Chapman said. He noted that while Ann wasn’t abused, “physical abuse today is far more evident and apparent than it was when I wrote the book. And we’ve had <a href="https://coveteur.com/love-languages" target="_blank">people</a> <a href="https://slate.com/culture/2015/01/the-christian-self-help-series-the-five-love-languages-reviewed.html" target="_blank">who</a> <a href="https://inews.co.uk/opinion/everything-you-know-about-love-languages-is-wrong-2790378" target="_blank">complained</a> about that, and I understand that.”

Impett said she hopes the research challenging love languages can start “conversations between partners about the importance of all kinds of needs, maybe opens up conversation of there being other idiosyncratic needs that people have in relationships.”

<a href="https://www.therapytribe.com/listing/brian-swope-marriage-and-family-therapist-philadelphia-pennsylvania-united-states-19110/" target=_blank>Brian Swope</a>, a licensed marriage and family therapist from Philadelphia, said clients have come to therapy sessions discussing love languages.

“It gets couples asking some questions, and it gets them to start making some change,” he said. “If those questions aren’t going deep enough, then that change is only going to go so far.”

Gottman said he has also heard couples talk about love languages in therapy sessions. “I think the therapist has to then expand it and say, ‘It sounds like part of the problem is you’re not feeling very loved and appreciated.’ And that seems to actually characterize almost all couples who go to therapy.”

Gottman thinks the focus on love languages skirts around the important question, which is: “‘What can I do to make you feel more loved now, and help me understand where you are right now?’”

Chapman said he knows love languages aren’t “the answer to everything in marriage, for sure. But I think it could be a helpful tool for any individual or any couple that wants to enhance their relationship and especially meet each other’s need to feel loved.”

Do you have a question about human behavior or neuroscience? Email <a href="mailto:brainmatters@washpost.com">BrainMatters@washpost.com</a> and we may answer it in a future column.

Sign up for the Well+Being newsletter, your source of expert advice and simple tips to help you live well every day

Johns Hopkins University, PhD in Neuroscience

Harvard University, BA in Neurobiology 

Richard Sima is a neuroscientist turned award-winning science journalist who writes the "Brain Matters" column for The Washington Post's Well+Being desk. 

Richard Sima

Love language advice for couples isn’t backed by science, new research shows

the-washington-post

Washington Post illustration; iStock

wb- love languages

An illustration of two classic statues with the headline: Does your 'love language' really matter? Scientists are skeptical.

Does your 'love language' really matter? Scientists are skeptical.

Food

Fitness

Mind

Body

Life

Well+Being

washpost

Well+Being Life

Well+Being: Healthy Living

Stories about friendships, relationships and how to build a meaningful life from The Washington Post’s Well+Being section.

Well+Being from The Washington Post covers healthy living, including nutrition, fitness, mental health, relationships, chronic illness and disability.