Brightly-colored triangles arranged alongside pictures from a "kill the bill" march, BLM protest, Ronald Reagan and Jesse Jackson.

The Washington Post

DEITIMELINE

Racial identity in college applications

Lauren Morris/CAPS Paterson

other

Class of 2023 graduates from USNA

Capitol Hill - Washington, DC

FILE PHOTO: The 2023 graduation ceremony at the United States Military Academy (USMA), in West Point

ILLUSTRATION

Racial Injustice-Schools

Edward Blum at the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC

For The Washington Post

affirmative action in college admissions

FILE PHOTO: Students and pedestrians walk through the Yard at Harvard University in Cambridge

HBCU’s 

staff

US Supreme Court to hear cases whether race-conscious education admissions programs are lawful.

for The Washington Post

Supreme Court hears arguments in Harvard, UNC affirmative action cases

US-JUSTICE-POLITICS-EDUCATION-RIGHTS-RACE

Contributor

Supreme Court Rules Affirmative Action Is Unconstitutional In Landmark Case With Harvard And UNC

Stringer

Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show expanded byline information on articles

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Why Google’s AI might recommend you mix glue into your pizza

Boeing continues to struggle with spacecraft problems ahead of human flight

Kabosu, side-eyeing Shiba inu who inspired the ‘doge’ meme, dies at 18

The United States used to have cachet in China. Not anymore.

Loggers encroach on an uncontacted tribe, and the government shrugs

U.N. chief ‘trusts’ Israel will comply with ICJ order to halt Rafah assault

A year after paying off our 2.75% mortgage, we still have no regrets

Home-insurance payouts are shrinking. Here’s how to prevent the worst.

Maxed out on your credit card? Here’s how to dig out.

Nationals loosen up and ride MacKenzie Gore to a win over the Mariners

The Nats’ offense is floundering. There are a few reasons.

At STK Steakhouse, the ‘vibe’ is loud, expensive and largely tasteless 

Here’s who The Post endorses in D.C. Council primary elections

How (not) to fix the border

The Trump hush money trial shows how far the GOP has fallen

Progressive Democrats aren’t turning activism into election wins

More voters are identifying as Republicans. That could bode ill for Democrats in November.

U.S. and allies move to tap frozen Russian funds despite Kremlin threats

I was homeless as a kid. Here’s how I survived. 

Kittens or puppies? Animals left at shelter turned out to be foxes — again.

A teen dropped out of high school during WWII. Now 99, she just graduated.

Want to find hidden gem restaurants? Follow the business crowd to lunch. 

American Airlines fires lawyers after blaming child for being filmed in bathroom

Budget airlines are dropping notorious fees. What changed?

Miss Manners: How do I know if something is a gift?

Ask Amy: I don’t think my son’s girlfriend is right for him

Carolyn Hax: If you’re happy alone, then why would you want a relationship?

In Milwaukee public housing, a padlocked patio becomes a battleground

‘America is a nation of Charlies’ | Opinion

The strengths and weaknesses of the case against Trump

Eric Lee

After the Supreme Court <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/06/29/affirmative-action-supreme-court-ruling/" target=_blank>rejected race-based affirmative action in college admissions</a>, some state and university leaders are already asking what that means for scholarships and financial aid aimed at students from underrepresented groups — and some scholars are predicting more legal skirmishes over race and higher education.

Some state leaders moved quickly to make clear that they intend to interpret the ruling broadly.

In Missouri, Attorney General Andrew Bailey (R) announced immediately after the high court’s rulings that he had “put dozens of universities and municipalities across the state on notice to immediately cease any use of illegal, discriminatory race-based policies.”

He said relevant institutions must stop using race-based standards to make decisions about things such as “admissions, scholarships, programs, and employment.” Other policies, such as making standardized testing optional, to the extent they are intended “to evade the clear constitutional prohibition on disfavoring applicants because of race,”  are also unlawful, he wrote.

Without affirmative action, how will colleges seek racial diversity?

Bailey did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The University of Missouri System posted a public <a href="https://www.umsystem.edu/ums/news/news_releases/202306292029248061_news" target=_blank>statement</a> saying they would discontinue the “small number of our programs and scholarships” that used race and ethnicity as a factor for admissions and scholarships to abide by the Supreme Court ruling. The state’s universities will honor aid already promised to students, they noted.

Uriah L. Orland, a spokesman for the university system, said Friday the change would affect a little over 5 percent of institutional aid across the four campuses. The total institutional aid for this past academic year was more than $301 million, and the portion that considered race or ethnicity as a factor was a little over $16 million.

In Wisconsin, Robin Vos, the Republican speaker of the state assembly, promised to introduce legislation to “correct discriminatory laws on the books.”

Chancellor Jennifer L. Mnookin at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, the state’s flagship campus, said in a statement after the ruling that the school had increased its underrepresented undergraduate student population by about 50 percent over the last five years, but still lagged many of their peers. They would need to change admissions policies to comply with the law. “At the same time, I want to reiterate that our commitment to the value of diversity within our community, including racial diversity, remains a bedrock value of the institution.”

The <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/06/29/affirmative-action-supreme-court-ruling/" target=_blank>Supreme Court ruled to restrict affirmative action in college admissions</a>, which effectively overturns decades of court precedent.

<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/07/01/affirmative-action-colleges-racial-diversity/" target=_blank>Without affirmative action</a>, how will colleges seek racial diversity? None of the options are simple.

Here’s everything we know about <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/06/29/affirmative-action-supreme-court-ruling-explained/" target=_blank>the Supreme Court ruling on college admissions</a>.

<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/07/08/college-scholarships-financial-aid-affirmative-action/" target=_blank>Colleges are assessing the criteria for race-based financial aid</a> after the affirmative action decision.

The Supreme Court’s <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/07/01/asian-americans-affirmative-action/" target=_blank>affirmative action ruling may hurt some Asian Americans</a> and has exposed a rift inside the community.

A coalition of higher education groups has argued in the Supreme Court that <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/08/01/supreme-court-college-admissions-race-first-amendment/">race in admissions is a First Amendment issue</a>.

Kelly Tyrrell, a spokeswoman for UW-Madison, wrote in an email Friday that the university is assessing the implications of the recent Supreme Court ruling and expecting the guidance the federal government intends to provide in coming weeks. “We will also remain engaged with the state legislature,” she said.

Elsewhere, Eli Capilouto, president of the University of Kentucky, wrote in a statement to campus last week of its commitment to inclusivity and diversity, but also noted that “based on our initial understanding, it appears that the Court has restricted the consideration of race with respect to admissions and scholarships.”

Jay Blanton, a spokesman for the university, said Friday that Capilouto’s statement was based on an initial review of the decision. “We are in the process of analyzing the decision further,” he wrote in an email. “At this point, we have not made any decisions or changes with respect to policies and programs, such as scholarships.”

The University of Kentucky does not offer any scholarships based solely on race, but he said there are a number of scholarships that are offered in which race is one factor among many considered in awards.

Admissions and financial aid, recruitment and retention and support of students, are so intertwined at colleges that it’s natural that people are asking questions after the Supreme Court ruling, said Nicholas Hillman, a professor in the School of Education at UW-Madison.

Karen McCarthy, vice president of public policy and federal relations at the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators, said school officials are asking question such as, “'What are the gray areas? How do we advance diversity and equity considerations but still be compliant with this decision and the law?'” Her association has been encouraging institutions not to rush to judgment.

But some legal scholars said the implication for financial aid, even though the cases were focused on admissions, is clear.

“Race-based scholarships are not going to be allowed,” said Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California at Berkeley’s law school. “In states that have eliminated affirmative action already, they have also eliminated race-based scholarships.”

At Berkeley, scholarships can be given based on financial need or merit but there are no race-based scholarships, he said, in keeping with the state’s ban on affirmative action.

UC-Berkeley can’t use race in admissions. Is it a model for the country?

A private donor or foundation — one that doesn’t receive federal funding and is not part of the government — could create scholarships to benefit students based on race, he said. But the university couldn’t administer that fund.

“The majority opinion stressed that race can’t be used as a factor in admissions decisions,” Chemerinsky said. “I think that that would also lead to the conclusion it can’t be used in financial-aid decisions, either.”

David Bernstein, a professor at George Mason University’s law school, also said he believes the court’s rulings will apply to financial aid and scholarships.

He said some schools had scholarships that were already dubious under previous Supreme Court rulings, but that hadn’t faced legal challenges. “Now there is an emerging infrastructure to file lawsuits,” he said. “I think that will affect giving out scholarships limited to minorities, or even scholarships where having minority status is preferred.”

Brown University

Columbia University

Susan Svrluga is a reporter covering higher education for The Washington Post. Before that, she covered education and local news at The Post. 