For The Washington Post

RUSSIA-US-DIPLOMACY-BASKET-COURT

Contributor

The Washington Post

(Michelle Kondrich/The Washington Post)

**ONE TIME USE ONLY FOR OP-LAMOTT

Sonia Sotomayor,Clarence Thomas,John Roberts,Samuel Alito,Elena Kagan,Amy Coney Barrett,Neil Gorsuch,Brett Kavanaugh,Ketanji Brown Jackson,Michael Dreeben

Children holding hands

ONE TIME USE FOR OP-CARNEY KIDS 

FEDERALISTGALA

Four Dalmatian Puppy

other

People visit the site of the Nova festival, in Reim

Fake Electors Indictment Arizona

Israel Palestinians Campus Protests

US-PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-EDUCATION-CONFLICT

**ONE TIME USE ONLY FOR OP-SMITH-HIGHER-ED

Former U.S. President Trump's criminal trial on charges of falsifying business records continues in New York

POOL

Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

How Trump’s allies amplify his Truth Social messages to the wider world

In photos: The scene after a deadly tornado strikes Oklahoma

Fashion previews, protests, parties: The scene surrounding the Met Gala

Commerce Department revokes more export licenses to China’s Huawei

Substack courts TikTokers with new ‘creators’ program

Indiana primary updates: Mike Braun wins Republican governor race

Postal worker finds WWII-era letters, drives 5 hours to deliver them

Strangers help Sesame Street puppeteer after heirloom necklace was stolen

Teen grabs wheel when driver passes out and school bus veers into traffic

RFK Jr’s ‘history lesson’ on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine flunks the fact test

No, posting is not better political activism than talking to voters

The legal — and political — stakes of Stormy Daniels on the stand

The Trump-Biden battle over the 2017 tax cut

That time football legend, rig-driving eligible bachelor Biden was arrested

Nats go over .500 the hard way by beating the O’s and Corbin Burnes

A look at what has changed since the Nationals were last above .500

Baseball can crush rookies. Why hasn’t it crushed Trey Lipscomb?

Indy Star bars columnist from Caitlin Clark’s games after awkward exchange

The Washington Post wins three Pulitzer Prizes

Carolyn Hax: Family pushes siblings to ‘make amends’ after their mother’s death

Miss Manners: I’m offended by a golfer’s skirt choice

Ask Amy: I want to be closer with my brother. He never reaches out to me.

Middle East conflict live updates: Israel says it has reopened key aid crossing; U.S. paused bomb shipments to Israel

U.S. signals optimism for Gaza cease-fire as Israel moves into Rafah 

The FTC’s noncompete clause rule goes too far

The next global crisis could come from the sun. We should prepare now.

Russia is using toxic chemical weapons, wrecking a ban it helped create

France tries to shed its rude reputation ahead of the Olympics

Don’t be a jerk at the airport: A guide for headphones

The new cure-all for vacation excess: the IV drip 

US-VOTE-POLITICS-ECONOMY-BIDEN

Haiyun Jiang

Cancel culture is back. The difference this time is that the targets are on the left. Republican officials and right-wing commentators are working overtime to criminalize and punish pro-Palestinian speech they disagree with, indiscriminately charging anyone who is insufficiently supportive of Israel’s <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/israel-hamas-war/" target="_blank" class="contextual_link">war in Gaza</a> with antisemitism. In this expanded understanding of the word, something as simple — and moral — as support for basic Palestinian rights is suspect.

When the current conflict began, there was understandable outrage over the pro-Palestinian advocates’ unwillingness to condemn Hamas’s grisly attacks on Israeli civilians. Dozens of student groups <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/10/10/colleges-react-israel-hamas-war/" target=_blank>issued reprehensible statements</a> excusing Hamas and blaming Israelis for their own deaths. These incidents were then used — and continue to be used — to more broadly delegitimize pro-Palestinian sentiments. Republican officials have released a stream of congressional resolutions and public statements that conflate support for the Palestinian cause with support for Hamas. In October, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and his co-sponsors introduced <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-resolution/413?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22sr413%22%7D&s=1&r=1" target=_blank>a resolution</a> that lumped Hamas’s “full-throated Jew hatred” with what they called “the subtle anti-Semitism that holds the State of Israel to a different standard than any other nation.”

These efforts are intensifying. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) <a href="https://twitter.com/SJKitFox/status/1730043004982104573" target=_blank>recently called</a> to suspend a CIA official for posting a picture of the Palestinian flag, comparing it to waving a Nazi flag during World War II. And in a charged congressional hearing last week, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) grilled the president of Harvard University, Claudine Gay, about antisemitism on campus. In <a href="https://x.com/shadihamid/status/1732419156828463382?s=20" target=_blank>an exchange</a> that went viral, Stefanik zeroed in on students’ use of the word “intifada” and claimed it was tantamount to a call for genocide against Jews. Unfortunately, Gay did not challenge the premise of Stefanik’s question.

“Intifada,” which means “uprising” or “rebellion” in Arabic, came into popular use in the late 1980s during the first Palestinian intifada, which included mass protests, general strikes and economic boycotts against the Israeli occupation. Some uprisings have been violent, but this doesn’t mean the word entails violence. This would be akin to claiming that activists who call for “revolution” are endorsing terrorism because the Russian and French revolutions involved prolonged reigns of terror.

But lost in Republican grandstanding is perhaps the most far-reaching effort yet to punish pro-Palestinian speech — a <a href="https://millermeeks.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/millermeeks.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/millia_065_xml.pdf" target="_blank">seemingly innocuous bill</a> in Congress to establish a commission to investigate antisemitism in the United States. The legislation uses  verbatim the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s <a href="https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definitions-charters/working-definition-antisemitism" target="_blank">definition of antisemitism</a> as “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews.”

The bill doesn’t specify what constitutes “a certain perception of Jews” and neglects to mention the alliance’s own elaboration, which includes the “targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity” and “applying double standards” to Israel as examples of potential antisemitism.

Under this reasoning, the commission will have broad powers to investigate any criticism of Israel that could be deemed unfair or overly exacting — including calls for a cease-fire or citing Israel’s disregard for Palestinian civilians in its targeting. As the Foundation for Middle East Peace’s Lara Friedman, who monitors legislative activity on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, <a href="https://twitter.com/LaraFriedmanDC/status/1732116246529736973" target=_blank>put it</a>, “The GOP wants to formally open an era of modern McCarthyism, with criticism of Israel [and] fake concern about antisemitism as hooks to target progressive Americans.”

There’s no need to speculate about intentions. Leading Republicans have already made clear that something as unobjectionable as posting a Palestinian flag is beyond the pale. I have been on the receiving end of such attacks myself. Sen. Ted Cruz (Tex.) <a href="https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1731030663594185209" target=_blank>found time to tweet</a> that I was “shilling” for Hamas because I said the Israeli military wasn’t prioritizing precision in its Gaza campaign.

I fully grant that for some pro-Israel voices, asking Israel to halt military operations — or using Arabic words — might be offensive. But being offensive is not the same as being antisemitic. To conflate the two is to weaponize antisemitism for partisan and ideological purposes. Because antisemitism is a growing problem — with incidents increasing across the West — devaluing its meaning is dangerous. It’s also an affront to free expression.

The irony should not be lost on anyone. For years, Republican officials have portrayed themselves as free-speech champions when it came to hard conversations on gender identity and race. They had legitimate reason to wave the cancel-culture flag. In their book, “<a href="https://amzn.to/48bIdMD" target=_blank>The Canceling of the American Mind</a>,” Greg Lukianoff and Rikki Schlott note that, in 2022, 72 percent of conservative college professors feared they would lose their jobs or reputations for expressing unpopular opinions and that 45 percent of liberal professors admitted to being willing to discriminate against conservatives in faculty searches. This makes it all the more disheartening that conservatives are now canceling people they disapprove of — on and off campus.

There is a better way. The fight for truth must be fought in the push and pull of unfettered debate. Sometimes, these debates will be uncomfortable and, yes, offensive. That’s life. This standard applies to everyone: Black people, Hispanics, Jews and Muslim Americans like me. Islamophobic sentiments, as much as I dislike them, are protected speech, too, and I’d counsel Muslim students to resist complaining to college administrators when they hear something that offends their own sense of identity and belonging. They should instead toughen up and learn to argue effectively in a free, contentious debate. This isn’t rocket science. It requires applying free-speech principles with moral clarity and consistency. If our principles can’t survive the toughest topics — and surely the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one — then what use are they?

Short-list, 2017 Lionel Gelber Prize

Georgetown University, B.S. in international politics and M.A. in Arab studies

University of Oxford, PhD in political science

Shadi Hamid is a Post columnist and member of the Editorial Board. He is also a research professor of Islamic studies at Fuller Seminary and the author of several books, including "The Problem of Democracy" and "Islamic Exceptionalism."

Shadi Hamid

washpost

Now Republicans are doing the canceling — over antisemitism

the-washington-post

Hill Coverage of Nov. 8, 2023

FTWP

Editorials

Columns

Guest opinions

Cartoons

Submit a guest opinion

Today's Opinions newsletter

Opinions

Sign up for Democracy, Refreshed, a newsletter series on how to renovate the republic.

Opinion Columns

Opinion Columnists

Sign up for the Prompt 2024 newsletter for opinions on the biggest questions in politics

Washington Post Opinions

The Washington Post Opinions section features opinion articles, op-eds, editorials by the Editorial Board, global opinions and letters to the editor on the issues of the day. Offerings include columns by Washington Post opinion writers, political cartoons by editorial cartoonists Ann Telnaes and Michael de Adder and podcasts by Jonathan Capehart.