Fake Electors Indictment Arizona

The Washington Post

For The Washington Post

Israel Palestinians Campus Protests

US-PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-EDUCATION-CONFLICT

Contributor

**ONE TIME USE ONLY FOR OP-SMITH-HIGHER-ED

Former U.S. President Trump's criminal trial on charges of falsifying business records continues in New York

POOL

Westminster Dog Show

ONE TIME USE ILLUSTRATION FOR OP-RIEVES-HUBRIS

(Chloe Cushman for The Washington Post)

US-POLLUTION-PLASTIC-CHEMICAL-RECYCLING

other

(Getty Images)

Training of 'Siberian Battalion' military unit in Ukraine, Kyiv - 10 Apr 2024

California voters approve Proposition 1, a $6.4 billion bond measure, Los Angeles, USA - 22 Mar 2024

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Middle East conflict live updates: Britain urges Hamas to accept ‘very generous’ 40-day Gaza cease-fire deal

Jayden Daniels is latest in Washington’s checkered history of first-round QBs

The Rangers swept the Capitals, and it’s time for the new core to take charge

The Rick Steves guide to life

The sad, stale state of in-flight vegetarian meals

How to train for a marathon on vacation

The new face of flooding

Where seas are rising at alarming speed 

Red carpet looks from the White House correspondents’ dinner

Soldiers reunite with their pets from overseas: ‘It meant everything to me’

Chiropractor works on giraffe, is nuzzled: ‘Giraffes are just giant dogs?’

An SUV was in flames on the highway. Strangers saved the driver.  

A TikTok ban could also end short-form video as we’ve come to know it

Meta’s oversight body prepares to lay off workers

An AI blood test purports to diagnose postpartum depression

Ask Amy: Boyfriend’s CPA dad did my taxes wrong for years

Miss Manners: I think kindergarten graduations are ‘ridiculous’

Carolyn Hax: Is checking his phone the best way to prove he isn’t lying anymore?

Election 2024 latest news: Trump, Biden returning to campaign trail this week

Trump and allies say Biden pays rent for ‘illegals’ in Michigan. Not true.

Tensions grow between Trump and Lake in Arizona race for Senate 

As U.S. rushes to send military aid, Ukrainians applaud lobbying effort

An assassination plot on American soil reveals a darker side of Modi’s India

Scotland leader Humza Yousaf resigns in latest setback for independence 

Eighty percent of Ukraine-Israel bill will be spent in U.S. or by U.S. military

Facts in the Trump courtroom v. ‘facts’ in the court of public opinion

Is student loan debt an emergency? Take our quiz.

Humans might need to re-engineer the climate

The Fed’s fight against inflation needs to lose the dot plot

 Donald Trump Speaks During A Campaign Rally In Green Bay Wisconsin

Viacheslav Ratynskyi

Some U.S. military officials appear astonished that the Ukrainian counteroffensive has not made a rapid breakthrough — and, <a href="https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/u-s-ukraine-clash-over-counteroffensive-strategy-cb5e4324" target=_blank>through anonymous quotes</a> to the news media, they are laying the blame on the Ukrainian military. Retired U.S. Army Brig. Gen. <a href="https://www.ohio.edu/engineering/alumni/distinguished/mark-arnold" target=_blank>Mark Arnold</a>, by contrast, isn’t the least bit surprised at the slow pace of the advance — and he’s blaming the Americans, not the Ukrainians.

Arnold, a cheerful former Special Forces officer with three combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, has spent extensive time near the front lines advising the Ukrainian military (at his own expense). He has come away impressed by the professionalism and élan of the Ukrainian army — while also cognizant of the limitations of the training and equipment they have been provided by the West.

I first met Arnold in Kyiv in May. Even back then — weeks before the start of the Ukrainian counteroffensive — he was telling me that the Ukrainians would not be able to make a breakthrough this year. However, he was — and remains — more optimistic about the prospects for decisive operations <i>next year</i>.

After getting back from Kyiv, I have kept in touch with Arnold and have found him a consistent font of realism. Back on June 23, at the very start of the counteroffensive, he emailed me: “I remain very skeptical that a decisive battle will occur this year that makes a material effect toward Ukrainian victory. That can happen next summer when the majority of maneuver equipment arrives from NATO into Ukraine.”

More recently, he has lamented to me: “The Ukrainians lack the mobility equipment necessary to breach high-density minefields and obstacles. U.S. Army mechanized infantry and armor battalions have tanks with antitank mine blades and heavy rollers in each company team. The Ukrainians do not.”

It is not just mine-clearing equipment that the Ukrainians are short of. Last week, Arnold emailed me: “If you add all the Bradley Fighting Vehicles, Leopard 2 and Challenger 2 tanks, and other equipment, the Ukrainians could outfit only one brigade. Only six battalions of the ~350 battalions in the ground forces have been trained in combined arms by NATO.” That simply is not enough, he said, “to move the needle.”

The Ukrainian attackers are further hindered because they lack, as he noted, air superiority. In many instances, Russian attack helicopters have targeted Ukrainian armored units as they were trying to clear minefields, slowing their advance to a crawl.

While some in the United States criticize Kyiv’s conduct of the counteroffensive — which appears to finally be gaining some momentum as the Ukrainians breach the <a href="https://twitter.com/courtneywmh/status/1695572732539244999?s=43&amp;t=A880z3De0OLXkuCBEwjZUQ" target="_blank">first line of Russian defenses</a> in the south — Arnold does not. “The U.S. military would be hard-pressed to achieve much better results without air dominance and long-range artillery systems,” he told me. “So, I am pleased with the progress the Ukrainians have demonstrated to date.”

The potent U.S. arsenal for Ukraine’s counteroffensive

Ukraine’s counterattack <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/06/08/ukraine-counteroffensive-maps-russia-war/" target=_blank>begins a new phase of the war</a>. The push comes after months of Western efforts to equip Ukrainian forces with sophisticated weaponry, to help Ukraine retake territory seized by Russia since last year’s invasion.

<b>What outcome is Ukraine hoping for?</b>

Ukrainian officials say they want to retake territory — including Crimea and land seized by Russian-backed separatists, which analysts say would be difficult. They also hope a show of success <a href="https://washingtonpost.com/world/2023/05/06/ukraine-counteroffensive-expectations-hype-russia/" target=_blank>will help win support from allies and grind down Moscow’s will to fight</a>.

Arnold rejects many of the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/22/us/politics/ukraine-counteroffensive-russia-war.html" target=_blank>specific criticisms being made</a> by the Pentagon, including the charge that the Ukrainians have diverted too many resources to Bakhmut in the east. He argues that the offensive there “has not consumed large volumes of mechanized equipment” and that “Ukrainian operations in multiple geographic areas are essential to tying down Russian military resources and defending Ukrainian ground in the northeast.”

While some in the Pentagon apparently want the Ukrainians <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/22/us/politics/ukraine-counteroffensive-russia-war.html" target=_blank>to risk heavy casualties</a> by charging straight into the teeth of Russian defenses, Arnold believes Ukrainian commanders have made the right choice to proceed more cautiously. “Prudently valuing and expending human resources during the counteroffensive while also waiting for the majority of armor and mechanized equipment to arrive next year is wise,” he told me.

Arnold’s argument — that Kyiv can achieve even greater gains next year — runs counter to the assumption among some U.S. officials that it’s 2023 or bust for the Ukrainian advance. “We built up this mountain of steel for the counteroffensive. We can’t do that again,” one former U.S. official told <a href="https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/u-s-ukraine-clash-over-counteroffensive-strategy-cb5e4324" target=_blank>the Wall Street Journal</a>. “It doesn’t exist.”

But is that really true? The West is ramping up production of ammunition: The U.S. Army <a href="https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army-increasing-155mm-artillery-shell-production/" target="_blank">expects that its output</a> of 155mm artillery shells will increase from 24,000 a month this year to at least 80,000 a month next year. At that time, the Ukrainians should also have M-1 tanks and F-16 fighter aircraft. Moreover, the Ukrainian troops who have taken part in this counteroffensive — and survived — will emerge much more experienced and adept at offensive operations.

Of course, the Russians will have an opportunity to rebuild their defenses over the winter, but, by advancing further south, the Ukrainians can bring more of the Russian supply lines in Crimea and southern Ukraine <a href="https://cepa.org/article/ukraine-victory-is-closer-than-you-think/" target=_blank>within range</a> of the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, commonly known as HIMARS, impeding Russian efforts to restock over the winter.

Arnold is optimistic that the Ukrainians can break through next year — provided they get more training and equipment than they received this year. “If the Biden administration is interested in ending this war,” he told me, “then it will provide the long-range weapons (Army Tactical Missile System, Harpoon anti-ship missiles, Reaper drones, F-16s), more M113 armored personnel carriers, Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Abrams tanks.”

But it’s not just a question of more weapons. The Ukrainian military also needs more training. “The Western training of Ukrainian military during the past 15 months is 85 percent basic training, 5 percent small unit leader training and 10 percent battalion training,” Arnold says. “Those efforts have trained less than 5 percent of Ukraine’s ground forces, and almost no officers at battalion level and above.” The results of that inexperience were evident in the faltering pace of the initial counteroffensive.

Arnold has been lobbying the Ukrainian General Staff and the Defense Ministry to recruit retired Western officers to train brigades inside Ukraine rather than making them go to other countries, because this will enable more units to be trained more quickly. He believes it is also essential to train corps-level staff in higher-level command functions so they can more effectively maneuver these units in combat. While retired Western officers would initially lead the training, they would be “training the trainers” so that Ukrainians could take over the courses themselves. Arnold is also trying to raise private-sector funds to expand the training and equipping of combat medics so that Ukrainian troops will be more likely to survive their wounds in combat.

“I find it frustrating, and the Ukrainians find it excruciating, that the West has the ability to do so much more to help end the war, but we’re not doing it,” Arnold told me. That needs to change. Rather than fall prey to the U.S. military’s “<a href="https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/03/28/us-russia-ukraine-china-short-war-strategic-patience/" target=_blank>short war obsession</a>” — imagining that every war will end quickly — the Biden administration would be well-advised to set up the Ukrainians for greater success in the future even if they aren’t able to achieve all of their objectives during this counteroffensive.

Finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in biography, 2019

Named one of America's "Great Immigrants" by the Carnegie Corp., 2019

Named one of the 50 most influential Jewish Americans by the Forward, 2018

Eric Breindel Award for Excellence in Opinion Journalism, 2007

Named one the 50 most influential Americans in foreign policy by the World Affairs Council of America, 2004

The Road Not Taken: Edward Lansdale and the American Tragedy in Vietnam

Invisible Armies: An Epic History of Guerrilla Warfare From Ancient Times to the Present

War Made New: Technology, Warfare, and the Course of History, 1500 to Today

The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power

The Corrosion of Conservatism: Why I Left the Right

University of California at Berkeley, BA in history

Yale University, MA in history

Max Boot is a Washington Post columnist and a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. A Pulitzer Prize finalist in biography, he is the author of the forthcoming “Reagan: His Life and Legend.”

Max Boot

washpost

Former general blames America for Ukraine’s slow counteroffensive

the-washington-post

FILE PHOTO: Ukrainian servicemen fire small MLRS toward Russian troops near a front line in Zaporizhzhia region

Reuters

Verified videos

Donbas region

Russian combat capabilities

HIMARS

War in Ukraine

prism://prism.query/global-opinions-english-only&limit=20

Global Opinions

The Washington Post's Global Opinions section.

Need something to talk about? Text us for thought-provoking opinions that can break any awkward silence.

Opinion Columns

Opinion Columnists

Columns

Sign up for the Prompt 2024 newsletter for opinions on the biggest questions in politics

Opinions

Washington Post Opinions

The Washington Post Opinions section features opinion articles, op-eds, editorials by the Editorial Board, global opinions and letters to the editor on the issues of the day. Offerings include columns by Washington Post opinion writers, political cartoons by editorial cartoonists Ann Telnaes and Michael de Adder and podcasts by Jonathan Capehart.