JABALIYA, GAZA STRIP -- It was a typical week in this densely populated refugee camp. There
For two days, Ikkram Said, a slender, 27-year-old woman who was four
months pregnant, said she could smell fumes wafting into her courtyard
from outside. Even with the windows closed, she said, her eyes stung,
she coughed constantly and had trouble breathing. Then one day she
noticed blood when she went to the toilet and became frightened.
She had a friend drive her to the camp's United Nations health clinic
and was advised to go to Shifa Hospital in nearby Gaza City. By the time
she got there she had stomach cramps and uterine contractions. Soon
after, she miscarried.
Said's story represents another question mark in one of the most
troubling, elusive and emotive issues to arise during the 23-week Arab
uprising: the effects on the Palestinian population of the Israeli
Army's frequent use of tear gas as a nonlethal riot-control weapon.
Palestinian doctors and officials working for the U.N. Relief and
Works Agency (UNRWA) that operates the refugee camps contend there have
been more than 1,200 injuries, dozens of miscarriages and at least 11
deaths from tear gas since the uprising began Dec. 9. The
Washington-based Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee has put deaths at 41
and used that figure in a successful lobbying campaign that last month
led the American manufacturer of the gas to suspend sales to Israel.
While they concede they lack hard data and autopsy results to verify
many of their claims, these sources contend the weight of circumstantial
evidence clearly indicates that tear gas is at least a significant
contributing factor in deaths and miscarriages among a refugee camp
population that, even in the best of times, is in a precarious state of
health.
"There is until now no solid scientific proof, but certainly the
accumulated evidence is strongly incriminating," said Dr. Samir Badri, a
Palestinian who is UNRWA's chief health officer in the Gaza Strip.
"When you see a woman with no previous history of miscarriages or
bleeding, and after exposure to tear gas she bleeds and aborts, you can
say safely it is the gas."
Israeli officials contend the Palestinian claims are based on false
or unsubstantiated information and are designed to fuel a propaganda
crusade that portrays Israel as waging a form of chemical warfare
against a hapless civilian population.
"We have not seen any cases where it could be proven by a coroner
that anybody has been killed due to exposure to tear gas," said Brig.
Gen. Yehuda Danon, the Israeli Army's surgeon general, in a telephone
interview, "and we have no scientific evidence that there have been more
miscarriages following the use of {tear gas}."
Medical experts say the issue is further complicated by the fact that
accurate statistics and unbiased accounts are largely unobtainable in
the chaos of civil unrest and military crackdown that has reigned in the
occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip since December.
But within the cross fire of charges and countercharges, interviews
with Palestinian, Israeli and American doctors who have first-hand
experience with tear gas, a reexamination of several cases, and
eyewitness accounts during recent months all point to these facts about
the use of tear gas during the uprising:There is no credible evidence to
support Palestinian claims that the Israelis are using any gas or toxic
chemicals other than the standard chlorobenzylidene malononitrile, known
as "CS," manufactured by Federal Laboratories Inc. of Saltzburg, Pa.
When properly used outdoors, the gas has limited effects that generally
wear off in 15 to 30 minutes.There is, however, much evidence indicating
that on numerous occasions soldiers and police have violated the
manufacturer's printed warnings by firing the gas into enclosed areas
such as rooms or small courtyards. Most experts agree that such misuse
of the gas can be harmful, especially to small children, the elderly,
pregnant women and people suffering from heart or lung problems.There is
debate over the possible long-term health effects of tear gas and
growing concern among human-rights groups and some medical experts about
its widespread use in countries including Israel, South Korea and
Panama.Health conditions in the squalid, overcrowded refugee camps of
Gaza have deteriorated dramatically in recent months due to disruptions
of medical services and child feeding programs caused both by
Palestinian violence and Israeli military restrictions. As a result, the
population is more vulnerable to many kinds of health hazards, one of
which is exposure to tear gas.
Upon close examination, some of the U.N. and Palestinian claims
appear groundless. After a visit to Gaza last month, UNRWA health
director John Hiddlestone told a press conference in Vienna about an
incident in which two young Palestinians were beaten by soldiers and
confined in a room where a reddish aerosal spray was used. "The room was
then shut and after an hour or so two dead bodies were removed," said
Hiddlestone, who said soldiers apparently had used "some very toxic
nerve gas."
Hiddlestone was talking about the death of Basel Yazuri, age 18, who
was killed Jan. 8 in the Rafah refugee camp, according to UNRWA
officials. But Jerusalem Post reporter Bradley Burston, who visited
Yazuri's house shortly after the incident, said that besides the red
powder on the walls and furniture of the room, which apparently came
from an Army smoke grenade, there were also multiple bullet holes
indicating someone had sprayed the room with an automatic rifle.
UNRWA's own report on the incident states Yazuri died from bullet
wounds and that there was no second fatality. The Army contends Yazuri
was shot dead while attacking a soldier with a knife. Arab witnesses at
the scene claimed he was badly beaten before being shot, and the
question of whether Yazuri's death was justifiable homicide remains
open. But no one except Hiddlestone says he was gassed.
In camps such as Jabaliya, tear gas has become part of everyday life
as well as a key element in the mythology of the Palestinian uprising.
Children turn the spent metal canisters into toys or wear them proudly
as necklaces. Dozens of canisters are hung defiantly from utility lines
throughout the camp. Almost every house, it seems, boasts a collection
of one or more of the thin tin projectiles or grenade-style rubber
containers.
There are no figures available on how much tear gas Israeli troops
have used since December, but the use is widespread. Soldiers have fired
gas canisters from rifles, hurled grenades by hand and dumped
30-inch-long cans from helicopters. Despite printed warnings on the
canisters that the gas is "for outdoor use only" and "may cause severe
injury if not used in accordance with this warning," soldiers pursuing
alleged rioters have fired tear gas into houses, stores, clinics and
even, on occasion, into hospitals.
Even now, at a time when the frequency of violent incidents and
fatalities appears to be dropping, Christine Dabbagh, UNRWA's
information officer in Gaza, says she gets daily reports of injuries
including tear-gassing from Jabaliya and other camps. On May 21, for
example, UNRWA's Jabaliya clinic reported treating 11 people for gas,
including Said, who later miscarried at Shifa Hospital. The following
day the report listed six tear-gas victims, two of whom later
miscarried.
Altogther, doctors at Shifa Hospital, which serves most of the
northern half of the Gaza Strip, say they treated 378 miscarriage cases
between December 1987 and February 1988, the first three months of the
uprising, compared to 335 during the same period a year earlier. UNRWA
health director Badri says he tried to compile statistics to do a
similar comparison at the Rafah refugee camp, but the numbers showed no
significant increase.
The causes of miscarriages remain elusive because even in normal
times, the estimated rate of miscarriages runs as high as 20 percent.
Ikkram Said, for example, had a miscarriage and then bore three children
before her latest pregnancy. It is impossible to know in retrospect
exactly why she aborted this time. Besides her physical symptoms,
doctors say her sense of fear after being exposed to tear gas could have
been a factor.
Similarly, the death of a three-year-old girl in Gaza City last
Friday remains uncertain. Local residents attributed it to tear gas. But
the Army said the girl had not shown symptoms of tear gas inhalation
when treated at a local hospital and said her body was spirited away by
family members before an autopsy could be performed.
Dr. Issa Satti, director and chief surgeon at Ramallah Hospital in
the West Bank, recalled last Feb. 20, when soldiers fired two CS gas
canisters into the maternity recovery ward. There were five women and
four babies in the ward at the time who were quickly evacuated, Satti
said, after which he tried to enter the room to remove the canisters.
"I thought I would just throw them out the window, but I could hardly
get into the room," Satti recalled. "It was so concentrated. I started
to cough, and then I couldn't breathe. Even 24 hours later you couldn't
enter the room."
Satti, who is one of the West Bank's best known and most respected
physicians, said he has concluded after months of watching soldiers use
tear gas in Ramallah that "when used properly outdoors, I think it's
harmless. But we've had people who have had gas fired into their homes.
Someone kept inside long enough could certainly die."
An Army spokeswoman said soldiers were instructed to use tear gas
only in open areas and that other uses of the gas were in violation of
orders. She noted that the Army had taken pains to choose a form of tear
gas that would not prove harmful to its own soldiers because sudden wind
changes often expose them to its effects.
Brig. Gen. Danon said the Army had relied upon two reports in 1969
and 1971 by the Himsworth Royal Commission into the medical and
toxicological effects of tear-gas use in Northern Ireland. Both reports
indicated that CS gas was the safest and least toxic and had the least
long-term health effects, said Danon.
The Army surgeon general conceded that health conditions in Gaza are
poor but said many factors associated with the uprising were to blame.
The United Nations' supplemental feeding clinics for pregnant women and
children have functioned only sporadically due to civil violence and to
military curfews. Sewage systems and running water have broken down in
many places and have not been repaired. Garbage collection is sporadic
at best.
"All of these are far more important in terms of their effect on the
health of the population than the occasional use of riot-control agents
such as tear gas," he said.
But Dr. Jonathan E. Fine, an internist who is executive director of
Physicians for Human Rights, a Boston-based rights group, contended that
the Himsworth reports had drastically underestimated the harmful effects
of CS gas.
"There's a tremendous under-appreciation of the dangers of tear gas,"
said Fine in a telephone interview. "In my opinion it's a misnomer to
call this stuff 'tear gas.' It's really poison gas . . . . "
A team of four American physicians from Fine's group who visited the
West Bank and Gaza in February said in their report that they could not
substantiate claims of an increase in the incidence of miscarriages due
to tear gas. Even so, Fine warned, Israel should not take the safety of
tear gas for granted.
"I have to question both the logic and the morality of what the Army
surgeon general is saying," said Fine. "It's a double standard he's
applying here. Would Israel use the same gas on its own children? I
don't believe so."