Opinion Originalism is bunk. Liberal lawyers shouldn’t fall for it.

Associate editor|
December 1, 2022 at 9:21 a.m. EST
(Doug Chayka for The Washington Post)
35 min

Liberal lawyers — and liberal justices, for that matter — risk being caught in an originalism trap.

Originalism, the belief that the meaning of the Constitution was fixed at the time it was adopted, is the legal theory that dominates the thinking of this conservative Supreme Court. Not all of the conservative justices are committed originalists. I count four of the six — all but Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and perhaps Samuel A. Alito Jr., who describes himself as a “practical originalist.” But they have all written or joined originalist rulings.