Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Biden confronts campus protests; Trump hedges on accepting election results

Kristi Noem just won’t stop talking about killing her dog

Noem’s dog-killing isn’t popular, though Trump supporters are divided

The new cure-all for vacation excess: the IV drip 

What’s the best bus to New York? We tested 5 for comfort and value.

Adaptive equipment is making national parks more inclusive

The New York Times, alone in its outrage over access to Biden

The ‘Access Hollywood’ video cemented Trump’s air of invincibility

Stephen A. Smith would like even more of your attention

Confident of victory over Ukraine, Russia exhibits Western war trophies

Two women are seeking Mexico’s presidency. But the race is about a man.

Hamas in Cairo for hostage talks as Israel briefs aid agencies on Rafah

The Post endorses April McClain Delaney and Tom Royals for Maryland’s 6th District

On Press Freedom Day, little to celebrate for Hong Kong’s journalists

Young Georgians want to be part of Europe. Their government is in the way.

Trump Media auditor charged by SEC with ‘massive fraud’

Google’s empire is massive. A judge will soon rule if it’s a monopoly.

Five tech products we actually like

In photos: At least 39 dead as historic flooding hits southern Brazil

Sea level rise brings new era of dangerous flooding

Michael Cohen keeps broadcasting despite being a witness

Ask Amy: My boyfriend just confessed he’s almost $20,000 in debt

Miss Manners: Is it inappropriate to reach out to old girlfriends?

Carolyn Hax: Longtime friend won’t forgive being last-minute canceled for a guy

Strangers help Sesame Street puppeteer after heirloom necklace was stolen

Teen grabs wheel when driver passes out and school bus veers into traffic

Cat climbed into Amazon return box, found alive 630 miles away

In a pinch, the Nationals finally find some offense

Is Pastis as good as our food critic thought? He sent spies to find out.

The Capitals, a team in transition, know what they want this offseason

In a significant advance toward creating the first “designer” complex cell, scientists say they are one-third of the way to synthesizing the complete genome of baker's yeast.

In <a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.aaf4557">seven studies</a> published Thursday in the journal Science, the researchers describe how they built six of the 16 chromosomes required for the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, altering the genetic material to edit out some genes and write in new characteristics.

“A lot of synthetic biology is motivated by this idea that … you only understand something when you can build it,” said Johns Hopkins computational biologist Joel Bader, one of the leaders of the project. “Well, now we know enough about biological systems that we can design a chromosome on a computer, synthesize it in a laboratory, put it in the cell, and it will work.”

Scientists have built designer cells in the past. In 2010, scientists at the J. Craig Venter Institute <a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/329/5987/52">created a bacterial cell</a> controlled by a synthesized genome by copying the DNA of one bacterium into another. Last year they <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/03/24/the-creators-of-the-first-synthetic-life-made-a-cell-with-just-enough-genes-to-survive/?utm_term=.db78711c220d">took the effort a step further</a> by building the first “minimal cell,” an organism never found in nature that had the smallest number of genes required for life. Several months later, a team led by researchers at Harvard Medical School <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/radically-rewritten-bacterial-genome-unveiled-1.20451">successfully re-engineered</a> a small fraction of the genes of the bacterium E. coli.

[This man-made cell has the smallest genome ever - but a third of its genes are a mystery]

This isn't the first time scientists have written genetic code for yeast. Jef Boeke, director of New York University Langone’s <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.med.nyu.edu_research_systemsgenetics&amp;d=DwMFAw&amp;c=RAhzPLrCAq19eJdrcQiUVEwFYoMRqGDAXQ_puw5tYjg&amp;r=0zEbkN1l3z4ILILkJ8xsJcHE3EYtyGcSbfX8oB5MP8A&amp;m=31jFUYcfP0zseUgu93j32Q0_3yt6xeVLiaJ5M4md-tQ&amp;s=Jk9Qyf8ZW84yrUyw9i5ri4D8TMsuwdUt2lZn7z8fHug&amp;e=">Institute for Systems Genetics</a> and an organizer of the project, and his colleagues synthesized their first chromosome in 2014. They dubbed their project <a href="http://syntheticyeast.org/">Sc2.0</a> (“Sc” stands for S. cerevisiae).

The new papers, however, signal an important advance. The chromosomes generated this time represent the largest amount of genetic material ever synthesized, and the new Sc2.0 cells are substantially different from their natural, or “wild type,” relatives. “In addition to building the thing, we’ve really added new features to chromosomes that weren't there before,” said Boeke.

Among the most significant of these new features is a program the scientists called “SCRaMbLE,” or “Synthetic Chromosome Recombination and Modification by LoxP-mediated Evolution” (scientists are congenitally disposed toward convoluted acronyms). The program allows scientists to rearrange elements within the genome to generate new and potentially useful permutations.

[After secret Harvard meeting, scientists announce plans for synthetic human genomes]

Whereas many of Boeke's peers labor for years in the lab trying to genetically modify organisms, the SCRaMbLE system “lets the yeast do the work and lets the yeast teach us new biology,” Boeke said. It's like a version of the lottery in which you can continuously and instantaneously roll new numbers until you get a result you want.

Other innovations in the Sc2.0 genome include the removal of duplicate bits of genetic code and the addition of short genetic sequences that distinguish synthetic chromosomes from their natural counterparts.

“By rebuilding chromosomes, these teams are showing that biology can be remade such that it is easier to measure, model and manipulate,” said <a href="https://profiles.stanford.edu/drew-endy">Andrew Endy</a>, a professor of bioengineering at Stanford University who was not involved in the project. Endy noted that evolution doesn't necessarily favor biological systems that are easy to understand; scientists have been analyzing the human genome for 25 years and still aren't really sure how a lot of it works. If researchers can engineer simpler cells — ones whose DNA the scientists wrote themselves — they will have an easier time harnessing those systems for research, medicine and industry.

Synthetic Yeast 2.0 project

Unlike other synthetic organisms, the engineered yeast is a eukaryote — a complex cell with diverse internal structures, just like the cells in the human body. It has more genetic material than the bacteria synthesized by the Venter Institute and Harvard projects.

Yeast is among the most well-studied organisms on Earth, a staple of biology labs, making it extremely useful for research. And it has myriad industrial, medical and scientific applications, from the production of biofuels to the development of vaccines. The Sc2.0 team plans to add a 17th chromosome to the designer cell to improve its protein-making machinery.

Incidentally, S. cerevisiae is the same yeast that bakers use to make bread. Some of the undergraduates working on the Sc2.0 project crafted a gene that would cause the yeast to produce beta carotene, the molecule that gives carrots their vitamin A and orange coloring, and baked a loaf with it. The bread came out of the oven with a lovely orange color, but Boeke wouldn't let them eat it. (They didn't have <a href="https://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm126420.htm">approval</a> from their Institutional Review Board, which oversees research safety and ethics.)

Culinary misadventures aside, the new papers illustrate “a major milestone,” said <a href="http://scs.illinois.edu/~zhaogrp/">Huimin Zhao,</a> a synthetic biologist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Though the Sc2.0 team still has several chromosomes left to generate, the new research provides proof of concept for future genome synthesis projects, and the system has become radically more efficient.

[The big trends in synthetic biology you need to know]

It took nearly 10 years for the researchers to build their first chromosome — even though they were working on the shortest one in the yeast's genome. But they needed less than three years to generate the next five chromosomes, which include some of the genome's longest, and Boeke said the team will complete the full genome by the end of next year.

Though the process has gotten faster, each synthesized chromosome still requires a herculean effort on the part of more than 100 collaborators working across three continents. The blueprints for the chromosomes are written via a computer program and then analyzed by biologists to see if they will work. These are then broken into short, manageable segments and shipped off to commercial DNA synthesis labs. The short chunks are then stitched together using a technique developed by Boeke and undergraduate students who took his “build-a-genome” course at Johns Hopkins, and then injected into the cell.

The compliant yeast cells make it easy to swap in the fabricated material for the DNA that's already there. And in many cases the new genetic material has no effect on the organisms' growth. The data for the entire Sc2.0 project is open-source, so anyone can borrow from or contribute to the research.

“This is a progress report, it is not a final product,” said Harvard geneticist <a href="http://arep.med.harvard.edu/gmc/">George Church</a>, who led the research on engineered E. coli. “But the fact that there are so many teams involved indicates this is a generalizable and adoptable strategy. It's not a one-off stunt.”

Church speculated that scientists could be heading toward “a post-CRISPR world,” in which, instead of using the heralded gene editing technology to modify chromosomes, scientists will simply synthesize entire new ones. “We’re seeing something that goes far beyond editing,” he said.

Church and Boeke are organizers of the <a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/353/6295/126">Genome Project-write</a>, an heir to the Human Genome Project that aims to develop the tools needed to engineer and test genomes on a large scale, dramatically reducing the cost of such efforts. The initiative drew criticism from many in the scientific community when it was formally launched last year. Francis Collins, head of the National Institutes of Health and an organizer of the earlier Human Genome Project, told <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/06/02/after-secret-harvard-meeting-scientists-publish-proposal-to-create-synthetic-human-genomes/?utm_term=.b0a44943d93e">The Washington Post</a> at the time that “whole-genome, whole-organism synthesis projects extend far beyond current scientific capabilities, and immediately raise numerous ethical and philosophical red flags.”

Endy of Stanford also urged caution: “Do we wish to be operating in a world where people are capable of organizing themselves to make human genomes? Should we pause and reflect on that question before we launch into doing it?” he told The Post. “They’re talking about making real the capacity to make the thing that defines humanity — the human genome.”

Boeke acknowledged that there are serious ethical considerations to be made when it comes to synthesizing the genomes of humans and even other animals. But he doesn't worry too much about the safety profile of Sc2.0.

“Let's say for the sake of argument there could be the yeast that ate Manhattan,” he said. “If such a yeast could arise in nature it probably already would have.”

In other words, nature has had billions of years to perfect the process of synthesizing genomes. Humans may have crafted a handful of sequences for a few single-cell organisms, but if our dreams — and our nightmares — involve someday mastering evolution, we've still got a long way to go.

<a href="http://wapo.st/2neCzD1?tid=ss_tw">Neanderthal microbes reveal surprises about what they ate — and whom they kissed</a>

<a href="http://wapo.st/2mZr3MM?tid=ss_tw">Caught on film for the first time: One of the world's rarest whales</a>

<a href="http://wapo.st/2lU4M4u?tid=ss_tw">Newfound 3.77-billion-year-old fossils could be earliest evidence of life on Earth</a>

<a href="http://wapo.st/2mU4b05?tid=ss_tw">These elephants sleep only 2 hours a day, and scientists have no clue how they do it</a>

<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/03/01/this-triceratops-is-a-smithsonian-icon-now-hell-be-fed-to-a-t-rex/">This triceratops is a Smithsonian icon. Now he’ll be fed to a T. rex.</a>

2019 Walter Sullivan Award for Excellence in Science Journalism–Features; 2020 AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Award - Silver; 2023 Evert Clark/Seth Payne Award for a young science journalist

Georgetown University, B.S. in International Culture and Politics

Sarah Kaplan is a climate reporter covering humanity's response to a warming world. She previously reported on Earth science and the universe.  