Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Carolyn Hax: Is it weird to ask other people to care about you?

Ask Amy: Can’t a single woman eat alone without interruption?

Miss Manners: Miss Manners: Gag gift falls flat

How Jim Jordan tried to connect the dots on Biden’s $8 million book deal

Biden’s false claim that inflation was 9 percent when he took office

Did Obamacare ‘massively’ increase the cost of health care?

Joey Gallo returns, but Nats endure another quiet offensive night

Bryce Harper, Joey Gallo and a bond forged by baseball since they were kids

A taco will always be a taco — no matter what we call it

‘Never Trump?’ ‘Never Biden’ voters might loom larger.

Ukraine gamble pays off: Republicans face little backlash in primaries

Russia shows resilience. There is more to do for Ukraine.

Trump promises tax cuts and fewer rules. CEOs shouldn’t fall for it.

Tariffs against China hamstring the transition to a clean energy future

Mexican taquería’s new Michelin star puts street eats on par with gourmet food

Police believe a U.S. rapist killed several women in Canada

With its energy network nearly destroyed, Ukraine already fears the winter

She finished chemo then got a medical degree: ‘The dream is real now’

Puppy abandoned with heart-rending note is adopted, named Minerva

Man, 91, shocks tiny firehouse with $500K gift: ‘Nobody knew how much I’d saved’

At campus protests, ‘DO NOT TALK TO THE MEDIA’!

Trump’s lawyer charges Michael Cohen lied to jury

CNN gets a presidential debate — and a much-needed win

Blue Origin to fly again as space tourism struggles to get off the ground

These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is real.

Boeing delays spaceflight again as it continues to struggle with leak

Book Tour: At home with Amor Towles

In photos: The scene in Houston after severe storms killed at least 7 people

Civilians flee new Russian attacks on Ukraine border

The world’s coolest hotels want to tell you a story

Cruise ships to return to Baltimore two months after bridge collapse 

Some cruise prices are about to get a little more clear

Trump

Kate Woodsome

Adriana Usero

President Trump’s lawyers are urging him to avoid an interview with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III because he is a pathological liar who cannot be trusted to refrain from telling falsehoods to investigators. No, really — that is essentially what the New York Times <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/us/politics/trump-lawyers-special-counsel-interview.html?hp&amp;action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=first-column-region&amp;region=top-news&amp;WT.nav=top-news">is actually reporting</a>.

“Lawyers for President Trump have advised him against sitting down for a wide-ranging interview with the special counsel,” the Times <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/us/politics/trump-lawyers-special-counsel-interview.html?hp&amp;action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=first-column-region&amp;region=top-news&amp;WT.nav=top-news">tells us</a>, citing four people familiar with the situation. “His lawyers are concerned that the president, who has a history of making false statements and contradicting himself, could be charged with lying to investigators.”

Buried in this is a hint at an important concession. It is likely Trump’s lawyers don’t simply fear Trump might lie to investigators because he helplessly cannot refrain from doing so even about trivial matters, but also that he might feel he actually has reasons grounded in self-preservation to lie to them — because he has something important to cover up.

In an interview with me, Bob Bauer, the White House counsel under Barack Obama, suggested lines of inquiry Mueller might pursue that could lead Trump’s lawyers to worry he might lie. Bauer noted that Mueller would ask Trump what he knew and when about the meeting Donald Trump Jr. held at Trump Tower to get dirt on Hillary Clinton from Russia.

Bauer suggested that Trump might tell investigators, “I never talked to Don Jr. about the meeting at Trump Tower,” when “in fact there may be evidence he knew about it before the Russians ever set foot on American soil,” Bauer said.

Bauer added that Mueller’s investigators would likely press Trump on what he knew and when about former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s conversations with the Russian ambassador during the transition, conversations about which Flynn lied to the FBI — and about what Trump knew about those lies to the FBI, as well. “When the FBI came to ask the national security adviser about this, for weeks nobody told the president?” Bauer asked rhetorically.

Questions about obstruction

Then there’s obstruction of justice. Mueller would have to establish that Trump acted with “corrupt intent” in trying to derail the probe. There is a wealth of lines of inquiry here. He’d ask why Trump <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/us/politics/trump-sessions-russia-mcgahn.html">directed</a> his White House counsel to urge his attorney general not to recuse himself and raged at Jeff Sessions’s failure to protect Trump from the probe. Why Trump <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/11/us/politics/trump-comey-firing.html">demanded</a> FBI Director James B. Comey’s loyalty and <a href="https://www.npr.org/2017/06/07/531927032/comey-trump-asked-for-loyalty-wanted-him-to-let-flynn-investigation-go">pressed</a> him to drop the probe into Flynn. Why Trump <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/09/us/politics/james-comey-fired-fbi.html">fired</a> Comey when that loyalty didn’t materialize. Why Trump <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/us/politics/trump-sessions-russia-mcgahn.html">wrote</a> an unsent letter firing Comey that reportedly mentioned the Russia probe in the first sentence. Why Trump <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html">ordered</a> the firing of Mueller and only backed down after his White House counsel threatened to quit.

Trump has denied some of these things happened. But now he will be getting questioned about them under penalty of perjury. And while Trump’s lawyers may fear he will lie about them, they also likely fear he might actually reveal his true motivations behind these actions without meaning to. While corrupt intent is difficult to prove, this inquiry isn’t just about establishing whether Trump broke the law, but also whether he committed serious misconduct that could be deemed impeachable. Such an interview could go a long way toward doing that, making it a minefield.

Indeed, buried in the Times article is a revelation that gives away the game: Trump’s lawyers want him to resist an interview by Mueller because they believe that in firing Comey, the president “acted within his constitutional authority and cannot be questioned about acts that were legal.” (Emphasis mine.) They want to gamble on Mueller subpoenaing Trump, after which the courts would presumably decide whether Trump can actually be questioned about those matters. But the bottom line is that this is the questioning they want to avoid.

The public White House <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/mueller-setting-trump-perjury-trap-793946">spin on all this is that they just want to avoid</a> a Mueller “perjury trap,” in which Trump is baited into lying about something trivial. But this is very likely misdirection, because there are all sorts of very consequential matters (such as obstruction) that Mueller can ask Trump about, and as the Times piece shows, Trump’s lawyers are actually eager to avoid that questioning.

Still, this spin hints at the broader strategy to come, especially when viewed with Trump’s continuing attacks on the FBI and his use of the Nunes memo to delegitimize the whole investigation. Trump may be laying the groundwork to use that delegitimization as a pretext to avoid a sit-down with Mueller — why should he submit to an interview when the probe is corrupt to its core?

“It creates a rationale for declining the interview,” Bauer told me. “The juxtaposition of these conversations about the interview and these escalating attacks — one could see them as connected.” Indeed, one could.

* WHAT HAPPENS IF TRUMP BLOCKS DEM REBUTTAL? Last night the House Intelligence Committee voted to release Demoratic Rep. Adam Schiff’s rebuttal to the Nunes memo, and Trump now has to decide whether to authorize it. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/us/politics/democratic-memo-adam-schiff-trump.html?hp&amp;action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=first-column-region&amp;region=top-news&amp;WT.nav=top-news">If he doesn’t</a>:

If Mr. Trump tries to block the Democratic memo’s release, House rules allow Democrats to seek a closed-door vote of the full House of Representatives to override the president. With some Republicans now arguing for its release, there is a possibility that the House could override the president’s decision in a rare rebuke to his authority.

The fact that it is even possible Republicans would feel pressure to release the Democrats’ corrective over Trump’s objections shows what a fiasco the Nunes charade has been.

* A SHOWDOWN OVER BANNON: The Post <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-attacks-schiff-ahead-of-vote-on-democrats-russia-probe-memo/2018/02/05/abf388fc-0a8c-11e8-8b0d-891602206fb7_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_memovote-625pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&amp;utm_term=.c27dbe1af9ca">reports that Stephen K. Bannon may not show up to a scheduled interview with the House Intel Committee today</a>:

A person familiar with Bannon’s plans said he would not appear Tuesday because the White House and the House counsel have not come to an agreement about whether Bannon is covered by executive privilege, as the White House insists. This person said, however, that Bannon will meet with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III before the middle of the month and will answer his questions with no restrictions.

In other words, the White House can only keep Bannon from spilling for so long.

* REPUBLICANS PANIC ABOUT SPECIAL ELECTION: Politico <a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/05/pennsylvania-republicans-special-election-389964">reports that Republicans are pulling out all the stops to stave off a loss in the March special election</a> for a House district outside Pittsburgh:

By the end of the weekend, Republicans were outspending Democrats on TV by a ratio of nearly 5-to-1.  … With Republicans already deeply anxious about the midterms, a loss in Pennsylvania’s 18th District, which Trump won by 20 percentage points, would show that the party is vulnerable even in deep conservative territory and that a political bloodbath could be in the making.

Yes, though even if Democrat Conor Lamb loses in a close race, that also bodes very badly for the GOP in the midterms.

* TRUMP’S LAWYERS TELL HIM PROBE IS WINDING DOWN: The Times reminds us that Trump’s lawyers have told him the Mueller probe would be over by now, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/us/politics/trump-lawyers-special-counsel-interview.html?hp&amp;action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=first-column-region&amp;region=top-news&amp;WT.nav=top-news">reports this additional nugget</a>:

A month into 2018, it remains unclear when Mr. Mueller will wrap up the bulk of his work. Privately, people close to the president have conceded that assuring Mr. Trump that the investigation would end by a certain date was primarily aimed at keeping him from antagonizing Mr. Mueller on his Twitter feed or in interviews.

The danger this sets up, of course, is that as the investigation grinds on, it becomes more likely that Trump will melt down and try to quash or constrain it.

* DON’T PANIC ABOUT MARKET SLIDE: CNN <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/06/investing/markets-selloff-reasons-not-to-panic/index.html?sr=twCNN020618markets-selloff-reasons-not-to-panic0635AMStory">explains why you shouldn’t panic about the sharp drop in the markets</a>:

There’s no talk of recession among economists. The U.S., unemployment is at a 17-year low. Average hourly wages went up last month the most in eight years. Consumer and business confidence are near record levels. That counts for a lot more than a few days of losses on Wall Street.

Of course, Trump has repeatedly held up the markets as proof of the explosive prosperity of the Trump Economy, so …

* WE’RE HEADED FOR ‘DOWNSHIFT IN GROWTH’: Paul Krugman <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/opinion/stock-market-trump.html?action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=opinion-c-col-left-region&amp;region=opinion-c-col-left-region&amp;WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region">steps back from the market slide to assess the economy and notes that we’re nearing full employment, which is good news but could also limit future economic growth</a>:

What the data say, I’d argue, is that at the very least America is heading for a downshift in its growth rate … growth in the U.S. working-age population, <a href="https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LFWA25TTUSA647N">especially in prime working years</a>, has slowed to a crawl, while <a href="https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PRS85006091">productivity growth</a> has been disappointing. Together, these factors suggest an economy likely to grow only half as fast as Trump promises.

Krugman adds that it’s possible the market drop portends something worse, and, if so, “rest assured that we’ll have the worst possible people on the case.”

* AND TRUMP SET HIMSELF UP: Politico’s Ben White <a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/05/trump-stock-market-down-324880?lo=ap_a1">explains how Trump’s boasting about the markets, combined with its sharp drop, have left him in an extremely precarious position</a>:

It arrived amid growing concern that an economy juiced by a massive corporate tax cut, and already at full employment, could overheat and require forceful action from a new and untested Federal Reserve chairman …  the tax cuts are … accelerating the date by which Congress must raise the federal debt limit. … there was still no plan in Washington to … avoid a catastrophic default. The result is that a president who tossed aside traditional presidential caution in cheerleading the stock market now stands poised to take the blame for any correction.

An Uncivil War: Taking Back Our Democracy in an Age of Trumpian Disinformation and Thunderdome Politics

Hunter College, BA in English

Greg Sargent was a columnist. He joined The Washington Post in 2010, after stints at Talking Points Memo, New York Magazine and the New York Observer.

Greg Sargent

The Washington Post

Editorials

Columns

Guest opinions

Cartoons

Submit a guest opinion

Today's Opinions newsletter

Opinions

prism://prism.query/site,/opinions/plum-line?limit=20

The Plum Line

Opinions from Greg Sargent and Paul Waldman.

Opinions to start the day, in your inbox. Sign up.

The Washington Post Opinions section features opinion articles, op-eds, editorials by the Editorial Board, global opinions and letters to the editor on the issues of the day. Offerings include columns by Washington Post opinion writers, political cartoons by editorial cartoonists Ann Telnaes and Michael de Adder and podcasts by James Hohmann and Jonathan Capehart.